Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28624153›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2017

Impact of ascites volume on clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer: A cohort study.

J Brian Szender, Tiffany Emmons, Sarah Belliotti, Danielle Dickson, Aalia Khan, Kayla Morrell, A N M Nazmul Khan, Kelly L Singel, Paul C Mayor, Kirsten B Moysich and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Feline Peritoneal Effusions-A Poor Prognosis?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Adipocyte Microenvironment in Ovarian Cancer: A Critical Contributor?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Brian SzenderDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Tiffany EmmonsDepartment of Immunology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Sarah BelliottiUniversity at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Danielle DicksonUniversity at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Aalia KhanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Kayla MorrellBiostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States.
A N M Nazmul KhanDepartment of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Kelly L SingelDepartment of Immunology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Paul C MayorDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Kirsten B MoysichCancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Kunle OdunsiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States; Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States; Center for Immunotherapy, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Brahm H SegalDepartment of Immunology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States; Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States; Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, United States. Electronic address: brahm.segal@roswellpark.org.
Kevin H EngBiostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USJacobs (United States) · US

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI Dean G. Tang · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
RPCI-UPCI Ovarian Cancer SPOREP50CA159981 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MOYSICH, KIRSTEN B., ODUNSI, KUNLE · 2013 to 2025
$19.6M
Novel immunological biomarkers ovarian cancer prognosisR01CA188900 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MOYSICH, KIRSTEN B., SEGAL, BRAHM H. · 2015 to 2019
$3.3M
MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACHES TUMOR IMMUNOLOGYT32CA085183 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI Scott I. Abrams · 2001 to 2026
$3.1M
Postdoctoral Research Training in Surgical OncologyT32CA108456 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI YENDAMURI, SAIKRISHNA · 2006 to 2020
$2.8M
Informatic Methods for Differential Signaling and Immune Co-Regulatory ExpressionK01LM012100 · NLM · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI ENG, KEVIN HASEGAWA · 2015 to 2017
$502k
IVIS Spectrum Imaging SystemS10OD016450 · OD · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI SPERNYAK, JOSEPH ANDREW · 2013 to 2013
$406k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS P50 CA159981NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188900NCI NIH HHS T32 CA085183NCI NIH HHS T32 CA108456NIH HHS S10 OD016450NLM NIH HHS K01 LM012100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the impact of ascites volume on ovarian cancer outcomes.

methodsClinicopathologic features of a cohort of patients with ovarian cancer were obtained from a curated database at a single institution. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Ascites volume at primary surgery was dichotomized at 2000mL and comparisons for high and low volume ascites were made. Additionally, to elucidate interactions between ascites and ovarian tumor progression, we evaluated the effect of intraperitoneal administrations of murine cell-free ascites versus saline in a syngeneic mouse model of epithelial ovarian cancer.

resultsOut of 685 patients identified, 58% had ascites present at the time of initial surgery. Considering the volume of ascites continuously, each liter of ascites was associated with shorter PFS (HR=1.12, 95% CI: 1.07-1.17) and OS (HR=1.12, 95%CI: 1.07-1.17). Patients with ascites greater than the median of 2000mL had significantly shorter PFS (14.5months vs. 22.7months; p<0.001) and OS (27.7months vs. 42.9months; p<0.001). After adjusting for stage, presence of ascites was inversely associated with ability to achieve optimal cytoreductive surgery. Consistent with these correlative results in patients, intraperitoneal administrations of murine cell-free ascites accelerated ovarian cancer progression in mice.

conclusionsThe volume of ascites at initial diagnosis of ovarian cancer correlated with worse PFS and OS. The effect of large volume on prognosis is likely to be in part related to reduced likelihood for complete resection of tumor (R0). If these findings are confirmed in independent studies, consideration should be made to add the presence of large volume ascites at diagnosis to the staging criteria for ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsAscitesCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansInjections, IntraperitonealMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsRetrospective StudiesSodium ChlorideAscitesBiomarkersOvarian cancerPrognosisTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID28624153
PMCPMC5568462
OpenAlexW2624927047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.