Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28623909›Full record

SynthesisBMC neurology2017

A systematic review and narrative synthesis of group self-management interventions for adults with epilepsy.

Amelia Smith, Alison McKinlay, Gabriella Wojewodka, Leone Ridsdale

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amelia SmithGKT School of Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
Alison McKinlayInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Academic Neuroscience Centre, King's College London, PO Box 57, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Gabriella WojewodkaInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Academic Neuroscience Centre, King's College London, PO Box 57, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Leone RidsdaleInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Academic Neuroscience Centre, King's College London, PO Box 57, London, SE5 8AF, UK. leone.ridsdale@kcl.ac.uk.
King's College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health 09/165/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpilepsy is a serious and costly long-term condition that negatively affects quality of life, especially if seizures persist on medication. Studies show that people with epilepsy (PWE) want to learn more about the condition and some educational self-management courses have been trialled internationally. The objectives of this review were to evaluate research and summarise results on group self-management interventions for PWE.

methodsWe searched Medline and PsycINFO for results published in English between 1995 and 2015. Only studies evaluating face-to-face, group interventions for adults with epilepsy were included. Heterogeneity in study outcomes prevented the carrying out of a meta-analysis; however, a Cochrane style review was undertaken.

resultsWe found eleven studies, nine of which were randomised controlled trials. There were variable standards of methodological reporting with some risk of bias. Seven of the studies used quality of life as an outcome, with four finding statistically significant improvements in mean total score. Two found an improvement in outcome subscales. One study included some additional semi-qualitative data.

conclusionsWe identified promising trends in the trials reviewed. In particular, there were significant improvements in quality of life scales and seizure frequency in many of the interventions. However, considerable heterogeneity of interventions and outcomes made comparison between the studies difficult. Courses that included psychological interventions and others that had a high number of sessions showed more effect than short educational courses. Furthermore, the evidence was predominantly from pilot studies with small sample sizes and short follow-up duration. Further research is needed to better evaluate the role of group self-management interventions in outpatient epilepsy management.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultEpilepsyHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf-ManagementTime FactorsEpilepsyPatient-educationQuality of lifeSelf-management education

Identifiers

PMID28623909
PMCPMC5474294
OpenAlexW2624844050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.