ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017
Biomarker correlation network in colorectal carcinoma by tumor anatomic location.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Regulatory Interplay of the Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers MACC1 and IER2 and Its Impact on Metastatic Cancer Survival.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Plasma Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 Has a Central Role in Biomarker Network Analysis and Is Associated With Poor Outcomes in Two Distinct Pediatric Cohorts of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Acute Respiratory Failure.Critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Large airway T cells in adults with former bronchopulmonary dysplasia.Respiratory research · 2024Article
- Metabolic Connectome and Its Role in the Prediction, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Complex Diseases.Metabolites · 2024Review
- Current and future directions in network biology.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Networks as Biomarkers: Uses and Purposes.Genes · 2023Review
- Association of gene and protein expression and genetic polymorphism of CC chemokine ligand 4 in colorectal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Progressive alteration of DNA methylation of Alu, MGMT, MINT2, and TFPI2 genes in colonic mucosa during colorectal cancer development.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2021Article
- Molecular networks in Network Medicine: Development and applications.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020Review
- Survival Benefit of Palliative Primary Tumor Resection Based on Tumor Location in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Single-center Retrospective Study.The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2020Article
- A correlation-based network for biomarker discovery in obesity with metabolic syndrome.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- A Network Analysis of Biomarkers for Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes · 2019Article
- Insights into Pathogenic Interactions Among Environment, Host, and Tumor at the Crossroads of Molecular Pathology and Epidemiology.Annual review of pathology · 2019Review
- Integrative analysis of exogenous, endogenous, tumour and immune factors for precision medicine.Gut · 2018Review
- Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte Antigen-4 (In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Expression and Clinical Significance of Sideroflexin 4 (SFXN4) in Colorectal Cancer.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal carcinoma evolves through a multitude of molecular events including somatic mutations, epigenetic alterations, and aberrant protein expression, influenced by host immune reactions. One way to interrogate the complex carcinogenic process and interactions between aberrant events is to model a biomarker correlation network. Such a network analysis integrates multidimensional tumor biomarker data to identify key molecular events and pathways that are central to an underlying biological process. Due to embryological, physiological, and microbial differences, proximal and distal colorectal cancers have distinct sets of molecular pathological signatures. Given these differences, we hypothesized that a biomarker correlation network might vary by tumor location.
resultsWe performed network analyses of 54 biomarkers, including major mutational events, microsatellite instability (MSI), epigenetic features, protein expression status, and immune reactions using data from 1380 colorectal cancer cases: 690 cases with proximal colon cancer and 690 cases with distal colorectal cancer matched by age and sex. Edges were defined by statistically significant correlations between biomarkers using Spearman correlation analyses. We found that the proximal colon cancer network formed a denser network (total number of edges, n = 173) than the distal colorectal cancer network (n = 95) (P < 0.0001 in permutation tests). The value of the average clustering coefficient was 0.50 in the proximal colon cancer network and 0.30 in the distal colorectal cancer network, indicating the greater clustering tendency of the proximal colon cancer network. In particular, MSI was a key hub, highly connected with other biomarkers in proximal colon cancer, but not in distal colorectal cancer. Among patients with non-MSI-high cancer, BRAF mutation status emerged as a distinct marker with higher connectivity in the network of proximal colon cancer, but not in distal colorectal cancer.
conclusionIn proximal colon cancer, tumor biomarkers tended to be correlated with each other, and MSI and BRAF mutation functioned as key molecular characteristics during the carcinogenesis. Our findings highlight the importance of considering multiple correlated pathways for therapeutic targets especially in proximal colon cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.