ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017
EPSILON-CP: using deep learning to combine information from multiple sources for protein contact prediction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning for Genomics: From Early Neural Nets to Modern Large Language Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Bioinformatic Analyses of Peroxiredoxins and RF-Prx: A Random Forest-Based Predictor and Classifier for Prxs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Incorporating Machine Learning into Established Bioinformatics Frameworks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Improved sequence-based prediction of interaction sites in α-helical transmembrane proteins by deep learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- RF-MaloSite and DL-Malosite: Methods based on random forest and deep learning to identify malonylation sites.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Article
- Homology modeling in the time of collective and artificial intelligence.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Assessing the accuracy of contact predictions in CASP13.Proteins · 2019Article
- Article
- Computational Prediction of MoRFs, Short Disorder-to-order Transitioning Protein Binding Regions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Review
- High precision in protein contact prediction using fully convolutional neural networks and minimal sequence features.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- ComplexContact: a web server for inter-protein contact prediction using deep learning.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Contact prediction is hardest for the most informative contacts, but improves with the incorporation of contact potentials.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurately predicted contacts allow to compute the 3D structure of a protein. Since the solution space of native residue-residue contact pairs is very large, it is necessary to leverage information to identify relevant regions of the solution space, i.e. correct contacts. Every additional source of information can contribute to narrowing down candidate regions. Therefore, recent methods combined evolutionary and sequence-based information as well as evolutionary and physicochemical information. We develop a new contact predictor (EPSILON-CP) that goes beyond current methods by combining evolutionary, physicochemical, and sequence-based information. The problems resulting from the increased dimensionality and complexity of the learning problem are combated with a careful feature analysis, which results in a drastically reduced feature set. The different information sources are combined using deep neural networks.
resultsOn 21 hard CASP11 FM targets, EPSILON-CP achieves a mean precision of 35.7% for top- L/10 predicted long-range contacts, which is 11% better than the CASP11 winning version of MetaPSICOV. The improvement on 1.5L is 17%. Furthermore, in this study we find that the amino acid composition, a commonly used feature, is rendered ineffective in the context of meta approaches. The size of the refined feature set decreased by 75%, enabling a significant increase in training data for machine learning, contributing significantly to the observed improvements.
conclusionsExploiting as much and diverse information as possible is key to accurate contact prediction. Simply merging the information introduces new challenges. Our study suggests that critical feature analysis can improve the performance of contact prediction methods that combine multiple information sources. EPSILON-CP is available as a webservice: http://compbio.robotics.tu-berlin.de/epsilon/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.