ArticleeLife2017
The genome and phenome of the green alga
Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Species Delimitation Methods inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From single pioneers to complex pro- and eukaryotic microbial networks in soils along a glacier forefield chronosequence in continental Antarctica.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Cyanobacteria and Algae in Clouds and Rain in the Area of puy de Dôme, Central France.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2020Article
- Bioengineering of Microalgae: Recent Advances, Perspectives, and Regulatory Challenges for Industrial Application.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Emerging Technologies to Enable Sustainable Controlled Environment Agriculture in the Extreme Environments of Middle East-North Africa Coastal Regions.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Potential for Heightened Sulfur-Metabolic Capacity in Coastal Subtropical Microalgae.iScience · 2019Article
- The genome and phenome of the green algaeLife · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the phenomic and genomic traits that allow green algae to survive in deserts, we characterized a ubiquitous species,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.