Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28623541›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers of medicine2018

Multistage analysis method for detection of effective herb prescription from clinical data.

Kuo Yang, Runshun Zhang, Liyun He, Yubing Li, Wenwen Liu, Changhe Yu, Yanhong Zhang, Xinlong Li, Yan Liu, Weiming Xu and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers of medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Heterogeneous network propagation for herb target identification.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kuo YangSchool of Computer and Information Technology and Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 100044, China.
Runshun ZhangGuanganmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100053, China.
Liyun HeInstitute of Basic Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Yubing LiSchool of Computer and Information Technology and Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 100044, China.
Wenwen LiuSchool of Computer and Information Technology and Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 100044, China.
Changhe YuInstitute of Basic Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Yanhong ZhangInstitute of Basic Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Xinlong LiInstitute of Basic Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Yan LiuData Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Weiming XuInstitute of Basic Theory of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Xuezhong ZhouSchool of Computer and Information Technology and Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 100044, China. xzzhou@bjtu.edu.cn.
Baoyan LiuData Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China. liuby@mail.cintcm.ac.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining effective traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) treatments for specific disease conditions or particular patient groups is a difficult issue that necessitates investigation because of the complicated personalized manifestations in real-world patients and the individualized combination therapies prescribed in clinical settings. In this study, a multistage analysis method that integrates propensity case matching, complex network analysis, and herb set enrichment analysis was proposed to identify effective herb prescriptions for particular diseases (e.g., insomnia). First, propensity case matching was applied to match clinical cases. Then, core network extraction and herb set enrichment were combined to detect core effective herb prescriptions. Effectiveness-based mutual information was used to detect strong herb-symptom relationships. This method was applied on a TCM clinical data set with 955 patients collected from well-designed observational studies. Results revealed that groups of herb prescriptions with higher effectiveness rates (76.9% vs. 42.8% for matched samples; 94.2% vs. 84.9% for all samples) compared with the original prescriptions were found. Particular patient groups with symptom manifestations were also identified to help investigate the indications of the effective herb prescriptions.

Indexed as

Medicine, Chinese TraditionalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesChildChinaDrugs, Chinese HerbalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersYoung AdultDrugs, Chinese Herbalcore network extractioneffective prescription detectionherb set enrichment analysisinsomniapersonalized treatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.