Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28623513›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2017

The spine instability neoplastic score (SINS) in the assessment of response to radiotherapy for bone metastases.

E Gallizia, G Apicella, T Cena, M Di Genesio Pagliuca, L Deantonio, M Krengli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Classifications in Brief: The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E GalliziaRadiotherapy, University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy.
G ApicellaRadiotherapy, University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy.
T CenaBiostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy.
M Di Genesio PagliucaDepartment of Translational Medicine, Chair of Radiotherapy, University of "Piemonte Orientale", Via Solaroli, 17, 28100, Novara, Italy.
L DeantonioRadiotherapy, University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy.
M KrengliRadiotherapy, University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy. krengli@med.uniupo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2064-8379
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVertebral metastases are often causing pain and spine instability. Radiotherapy is of significant benefit for painful spine metastases but the response can be very variable. The spine instability neoplastic score (SINS) is a recent classification system for diagnosis of spinal instability caused by vertebral metastases. We analysed the degree of pain relief, the need of drug therapy and the imaging features and the SINS before and after radiotherapy. In particular, we investigated the possible correlation of spine instability defined by pre-treatment SINS with pretreatment pain and with response to radiotherapy. MATERIAL/

methodsThis study included 121 patients with spine metastases treated with palliative 3D conformal radiotherapy. Pain "at rest" and "breakthrough pain", need for drug therapy in terms of "anti-inflammatory", "weak opioid", "strong opioid", imaging studies and SINS were assessed before and after radiotherapy. Statistical analysis was performed by the correlation coefficient of Spearman and Kruskal-Wallis test.

resultsPain relief after radiotherapy was observed in 50.4 and 57.8% of patients in terms of pain at rest and breakthrough pain, respectively. The correlation between pain before radiotherapy and SINS was not statistically significant for both pain at rest (p = 0.4) and breakthrough pain (p = 0.49). The correlation between pain response after radiotherapy and SINS was statistically significant for both pain at rest (p = 0.007) and breakthrough pain (p = 0.047). DISCUSSION/

conclusionThe degree of instability, classified according to SINS, resulted to be predictive factor for pain response after radiotherapy. SINS might become a valid tool to identify those patients who can benefit the most from radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansJoint InstabilityMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPalliative CarePrognosisRadiotherapy, ConformalSpinal NeoplasmsPainRadiotherapySINSSpine instability neoplastic scoreSpine metastasis

Identifiers

PMID28623513
OpenAlexW2625250866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.