Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28623363›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Machine learning workflow to enhance predictions of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) through drug-gene interactions: application to drugs for cutaneous diseases.

Kalpana Raja, Matthew Patrick, James T Elder, Lam C Tsoi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A review on machine learning approaches and trends in drug discovery.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Artificial Intelligence for Drug Toxicity and Safety.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Deep learning improves prediction of drug-drug and drug-food interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kalpana RajaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Matthew PatrickDepartment of Dermatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
James T ElderDepartment of Dermatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Lam C TsoiDepartment of Dermatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. alextsoi@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1627-5722

Funding

Genetic and Genomic Dissection of Psoriatic ArthritisR01AR063611 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ELDER, JAMES TILFORD, GLADMAN, DAFNA D · 2012 to 2023
$6.2M
Functional Genomics of PsoriasisR01AR065183 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ELDER, JAMES TILFORD · 2013 to 2016
$1.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR063611NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR065183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) pose critical public health issues, affecting over 6% of hospitalized patients. While knowledge of potential drug-drug interactions (DDI) is necessary to prevent ADR, the rapid pace of drug discovery makes it challenging to maintain a strong insight into DDIs. In this study, we present a novel literature-mining framework for enhancing the predictions of DDIs and ADR types by integrating drug-gene interactions (DGIs). The ADR types were adapted from a DDI corpus, including i) adverse effect; ii) effect at molecular level; iii) effect related to pharmacokinetics; and iv) DDIs without known ADRs. By using random forest classifier our approach achieves an F-score of 0.87 across the ADRs classification using only the DDI features. We then enhanced the performance of the classifier by including DGIs (F-score = 0.90), and applied the classification model trained with the DDI corpus to identify the drugs that might interact with the drugs for cutaneous diseases. We successfully predict previously known ADRs for drugs prescribed to cutaneous diseases, and are also able to identify promising new ADRs.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMachine LearningDatabases, GeneticGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksReproducibility of ResultsSkin DiseasesWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID28623363
PMCPMC5473874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.