Erratum to: Social relationships, mental health and wellbeing in physical disability: a systematic review.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Psychometric properties of the Hebrew KIDSCREEN 52, 27 and 10 items: a cross-sectional study of self and parents reports in youth with and without physical disabilities.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
   Article
2. Adaptive Shooting Disciplines: A Scoping Review of the Literature with Bibliometric Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
   Article
3. Young para-athletes display more hedonic well-being than people with disabilities not taking part in competitive sports: insights from a multi-country survey.Frontiers in psychology · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  Social relationships, mental health and wellbeing in physical disability: a systematic review.2017

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.