Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28622659›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in plant biology2017

Understanding and exploiting plant beneficial microbes.

Omri M Finkel, Gabriel Castrillo, Sur Herrera Paredes, Isai Salas González, Jeffery L Dangl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in plant biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 260 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
260citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

260 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Insights into conventional and recent technologies for arsenic bioremediation: A systematic review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Use of beneficial microorganisms in bean cultivation: strategies employed to increase productivity.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

200 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Omri M FinkelDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA. Electronic address: ofinkel@live.unc.edu.
Gabriel CastrilloDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA.
Sur Herrera ParedesDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA; Curriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA.
Isai Salas GonzálezDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA; Curriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA.
Jeffery L DanglDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA; Curriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA; Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA; Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA.

Funding

UNC Predoc Training Progr in Bioinformatics/Comp BiologyT32GM067553 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELSTON, TIMOTHY C · 2005 to 2019
$2.5M
Designing robust synthetic microbiota for increasing plant productivityF32GM117758 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FINKEL, OMRI M · 2016 to 2017
$115k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteHoward Hughes Medical Institute GBMF3030NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM117758NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM067553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After a century of incremental research, technological advances, coupled with a need for sustainable crop yield increases, have reinvigorated the study of beneficial plant-microbe interactions with attention focused on how microbiomes alter plant phenotypes. We review recent advances in plant microbiome research, and describe potential applications for increasing crop productivity. The phylogenetic diversity of plant microbiomes is increasingly well characterized, and their functional diversity is becoming more accessible. Large culture collections are available for controlled experimentation, with more to come. Genetic resources are being brought to bear on questions of microbiome function. We expect that microbial amendments of varying complexities will expose rules governing beneficial plant-microbe interactions contributing to plant growth promotion and disease resistance, enabling more sustainable agriculture.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPhylogenyPlantsSoil Microbiology

Identifiers

PMID28622659
PMCPMC5561662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.