A Mechanogenetic Toolkit for Interrogating Cell Signaling in Space and Time.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Precise Regulation of Membrane Proteins: From Physical Technology to Biomolecular Strategy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
   Review
2. A Physical Framework to Study the Effect of Magnetic Fields on the Spike-Time Coding.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2024
   Article
3. Modulating mechanical stability of heterodimerization between engineered orthogonal helical domains.Nature communications · 2020
   Article
4. Influence of the Assembly State on the Functionality of a Supramolecular Jagged1-Mimicking Peptide Additive.ACS omega · 2019
   Article
5. Dynamic Ligand Discrimination in the Notch Signaling Pathway.Cell · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  A Mechanogenetic Toolkit for Interrogating Cell Signaling in Space and Time.2016

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.