Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28622373›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

A versatile and low-cost open source pipetting robot for automation of toxicological and ecotoxicological bioassays.

Sebastian Steffens, Leonie Nüßer, Thomas-Benjamin Seiler, Nadine Ruchter, Mark Schumann, Ricarda Döring, Catrina Cofalla, Avi Ostfeld, Elad Salomons, Holger Schüttrumpf and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Open Hardware in Science: The Benefits of Open Electronics.Integrative and comparative biology · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An Open-Source Plate Reader.Biochemistry · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sebastian SteffensDepartment of Ecosystem Analysis, Institute of Environmental Research, ABBt - Aachen Biology and Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Leonie NüßerDepartment of Ecosystem Analysis, Institute of Environmental Research, ABBt - Aachen Biology and Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Thomas-Benjamin SeilerDepartment of Ecosystem Analysis, Institute of Environmental Research, ABBt - Aachen Biology and Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Nadine RuchterAquatic Ecology and Centre of Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Mark SchumannAquatic Ecology and Centre of Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Ricarda DöringInstitute for Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Catrina CofallaInstitute for Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Avi OstfeldEnvironmental, Water and Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Elad SalomonsOptiWater, Haifa, Israel.
Holger SchüttrumpfInstitute for Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Henner HollertDepartment of Ecosystem Analysis, Institute of Environmental Research, ABBt - Aachen Biology and Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Markus BrinkmannDepartment of Ecosystem Analysis, Institute of Environmental Research, ABBt - Aachen Biology and Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4985-263X
RWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DETechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decades, bioassays and whole-organism bioassay have become important tools not only in compliance testing of industrial chemicals and plant protection products, but also in the monitoring of environmental quality. With few exceptions, such test systems are discontinuous. They require exposure of the biological test material in small units, such as multiwell plates, during prolonged incubation periods, and do not allow online read-outs. It is mostly due to these shortcomings that applications in continuous monitoring of, e.g., drinking or surface water quality are largely missing. We propose the use of pipetting robots that can be used to automatically exchange samples in multiwell plates with fresh samples in a semi-static manner, as a potential solution to overcome these limitations. In this study, we developed a simple and low-cost, versatile pipetting robot constructed partly using open-source hardware that has a small footprint and can be used for online monitoring of water quality by means of an automated whole-organism bioassay. We tested its precision in automated 2-fold dilution series and used it for exposure of zebrafish embryos (Danio rerio)-a common model species in ecotoxicology-to cadmium chloride and permethrin. We found that, compared to conventional static or semi-static exposure scenarios, effects of the two chemicals in zebrafish embryos generally occurred at lower concentrations, and analytically verified that the increased frequency of media exchange resulted in a greater availability of the chemical. In combination with advanced detection systems this custom-made pipetting robot has the potential to become a valuable tool in future monitoring strategies for drinking and surface water.

Indexed as

Automation, LaboratoryBiological AssayEcotoxicologyRoboticsAnimalsZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID28622373
PMCPMC5473567
OpenAlexW2625223034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.