Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28622372›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane: A meta-analysis.

Wei-Cheng Chang, Chin Lin, Cho-Hao Lee, Tzu-Ling Sung, Tao-Hsin Tung, Jorn-Hon Liu

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04306718 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Cultivation of Hyalocytes From ILM and ERM Samples: a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorVienna Institute for Research in Ocular SurgeryRan2019 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsEpiretinal MembraneArmsmembrane peeling
NCT07095907 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Post-surgical Functional Results in Patients With Epiretinal Membrane Undergoing Controlled Macular Detachment: Pilot Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsociación para Evitar la Ceguera en MéxicoRan2025 to 2026Enrolled36ConditionsEpiretinal Membrane SurgeryArmsPars plana vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane peeling and controlled macular detachment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. [Macular pucker surgery with and without delamination of the internal limiting membrane-a prospective randomized study].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2019
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Effect of membrane peeling on the ganglion cell inner-plexiform layer in glaucomatous eyes with idiopathic epiretinal membrane.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Negative impact of internal limiting membrane peeling in vitreous hemorrhage secondary to retinal vein occlusion with macular ischemia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Epiretinal membrane: an overview and update.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wei-Cheng ChangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8937-6105
Chin LinSchool of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Cho-Hao LeeDepartment of InternalMedicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Tzu-Ling SungSchool of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Tao-Hsin TungDepartment of Medical Research and Education, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jorn-Hon LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3288-5619
Cheng Hsin General Hospital · TWNational Defense Medical Center · TWFu Jen Catholic University · TWTri-Service General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies on vitrectomy with and without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) have yielded uncertain results regarding clinical outcomes and recurrence rates.

objectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of vitrectomy with and without ILM peeling for idiopathic ERM.

methodsDatabases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CNKI databases, FDA.gov, and ClinicalTrials.gov, published until July 2016, were searched to identify studies comparing the clinical outcomes following vitrectomy with ERM and ILM peeling and with only ERM peeling, for treating idiopathic ERM. Studies with sufficient data were selected. Pooled results were expressed as mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for vitrectomy with and without ILM peeling with regard to postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and ERM recurrence rate.

resultsEleven retrospective studies and one randomized controlled trial involving 756 eyes were identified. This demonstrated that the postoperative BCVA within 12 months was significantly better in the non-ILM peeling group (MD = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.08; P = 0.0460), but that the patients in the ILM peeling group had significantly better postoperative BCVA after 18 months (MD = -0.13, 95% CI: -0.23 to -0.04; P = 0.0049) than did those in the non-ILM peeling group. The non-ILM peeling group exhibited a higher reduction in postoperative CRT (MD = 51.55, 95% CI:-84.23 to -18.88; P = 0.0020) and a higher recurrence rate of ERM (RR = 0.34, 95% CI:0.16 to 0.72; P = 0.0048) than did the ILM peeling group. However, the improvement rates of BCVA (RR = 1.03, 95% CI:0.72 to 1.47; P = 0.8802) and postoperative CRTs (MD = 18.15, 95% CI:-2.29 to 38.60; P = 0.0818) were similar between the two groups.

conclusionsVitrectomy with ILM peeling results in better visual improvement in long-term follow-ups and lower ERM recurrence rates, and vitrectomy with only ERM peeling is more efficacious in reduction of CRT than is vitrectomy with ILM peeling.

Indexed as

Epiretinal MembraneFemaleHumansMaleVitrectomy

Identifiers

PMID28622372
PMCPMC5473547
OpenAlexW2626189127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.