Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28622178›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesia and analgesia2018

Labor Analgesia Onset With Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Traditional Epidural Using a 26-Gauge Whitacre Needle and 0.125% Bupivacaine Bolus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Sylvia H Wilson, Bethany J Wolf, Kayla Bingham, Quiana S Scotland, John M Fox, Erick M Woltz, Latha Hebbar

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03366935 nacompletednot on this map

Combined Implementation of Dural Puncture Epidural Technique and Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai First Maternity and Infant HospitalRan2017 to 2018Enrolled120ConditionsLabor Pain, Labor AnalgesiaArmsEPL and CEI, DPE and CEI, DPE and PIEB
NCT05196256 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Study Comparing Three Different Anesthesic Techniques for Pregnant Women in Labour: Dural Puncture Epidural, Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural. Evaluation of the Pain Control and the Hypotension Incidence All Along the Labour and Delivery

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrugmann University HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled90ConditionsObstetric Pain, AnalgesiaArmsDural puncture, Combined spinal epidural analgesia, Epidural analgesia, Sufentanyl/Levobupivacaine
NCT06156709 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Using Local Anesthetics in a Higher Volume and Lower Dose On Analgesic Quality of Labor Analgesia With Dural Puncture Epidural Technique: Double-Blind Randomised Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAtaturk UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled54ConditionsAnalgesiaArmsGroup I: Lower Volume with Higher Anaesthetic Concentration, Group II: Higher Volume with LowerAnaesthetic Concentration
NCT06329713 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Changing the Programmed Auto Bolus Interval Time On Analgesic Quality of Labor Analgesia With Dural Puncture Epidural Technique: Double-Blind Randomised Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAtaturk UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled54ConditionsAnalgesiaArmsGroup I: 30 Min Interval Time, Group II: 60 Min Interval Time
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effective volume of ropivacaine 0.1% plus sufentanil 0.3 μg·mLCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Determination of Median Effective Concentration (ECDrug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. The significance of different intervertebral spaces in combined spinal epidural anesthesia in cesarean section.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sylvia H WilsonFrom the Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Bethany J Wolf
Kayla Bingham
Quiana S Scotland
John M Fox
Erick M Woltz
Latha Hebbar
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR000062 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2012 to 2014
$9.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000062NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLumbar epidurals (LEs) provide excellent analgesia. Combined spinal epidural and dural puncture epidural (DPE) are 2 techniques to expedite neuraxial analgesia onset. In DPE, dura is punctured but medication is not administered in the cerebrospinal fluid. Expedited analgesia onset has been demonstrated with DPE, using 0.25% bupivacaine; however, this concentration may impede an unassisted vaginal birth and is not currently used for induction and maintenance of labor analgesia. The primary goal of this study was to compare the percentage of patients who achieved adequate labor analgesia following DPE or LE with an epidural bolus of 0.125% bupivacaine. Adequate labor analgesia was defined as Visual Analog Scale (VAS) measurement ≤ 10 mm on a 100-mm scale during active contractions, measured 10 minutes after epidural bolus initiation.

methodsLaboring patients were randomly assigned to receive LE or DPE. Immediately before epidural placement, subjects marked a VAS score during an active contraction and parturients with VAS < 50 mm were excluded. The epidural space was identified by a loss of resistance technique to saline (17G Tuohy needle [Arrow International, Inc, Redding, PA]). In the DPE group, dura was punctured with a 26G Whitacre needle (Arrow International, Inc). In all participants, a 19G epidural catheter (Arrow International, Inc) was inserted. An epidural bolus was then administered over 3 minutes (12 mL, 0.125% bupivacaine, 50 μg fentanyl) followed by infusion (0.1% bupivacaine, 2 μg/mL fentanyl). After initiation of epidural bolus (time zero), VAS measurements were collected at 2-minute intervals for up to 20 minutes. Median time to achieve adequate analgesia by treatment group was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Time to achieving adequate analgesia was evaluated using a Cox regression model. All analyses were conducted in SAS version 9.4. (SAS Institute, Cary, NC)

results: Data were analyzed from 80 participants (40 per group). Adequate analgesia at 10 minutes did not differ by neuraxial technique (DPE = 55.3% vs LE = 44.7%; P= .256). However, parturients receiving DPE had shorter median times to adequate analgesia (median [95% confidence interval], 8 minutes [6-10] vs 10 minutes [8-14]) and a 67% increase in the relative risk of achieving adequate analgesia compared to LE (relative risk = 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.64; P= .042).

conclusionsAlthough the percentage of parturients achieving adequate labor analgesia at 10 minutes after epidural bolus did not differ by technique, DPE was associated with faster time to VAS ≤ 10 mm compared with LE.

Indexed as

NeedlesAdultAnalgesia, EpiduralAnalgesia, ObstetricalAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineFemaleHumansInjections, SpinalLabor, ObstetricPain MeasurementPregnancyTime FactorsAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaine

Identifiers

PMID28622178
PMCPMC7179732
OpenAlexW2626251886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.