ArticlemAbs
Changes to International Nonproprietary Names for antibody therapeutics 2017 and beyond: of mice, men and more.
Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nomenclature of therapies in inflammatory bowel disease: A journey through time and terminology.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2026Review
- Article
- Therapeutic antibodies in oncology: an immunopharmacological overview.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024Review
- Monoclonal Antibodies for Chronic Pain Treatment: Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- The Perspective of Therapeutic Antibody Marketing in Iran: Trend and Estimation by 2025.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2021Article
- Selected Biological Medicinal Products and Their Veterinary Use.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Review
- New Approaches to Targeting B Cells for Myasthenia Gravis Therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Nomenclature of humanized mAbs: Early concepts, current challenges and future perspectives.Human antibodies · 2019Review
- Article
- Lessons learned from merging wet lab experiments with molecular simulation to improve mAb humanization.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2018Article
- [Biologics in Rhinology - Forthcoming Personalized Concepts: the Future Starts Today].Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2018Review
- The human antibody sequence space and structural design of the V, J regions, and CDRH3 with Rosetta.mAbsArticle
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Active pharmaceutical substances require an International Nonproprietary Name (INN) assigned by the World Health Organization (WHO) to obtain market authorization as a medicinal product. INNs are selected to represent a unique, generic name for a drug enabling unambiguous identification by stakeholders worldwide. INNs may be requested after initiating clinical development of an investigational drug. Pharmaceutical classes are indicated by a common stem or suffix. Currently, INNs for monoclonal antibody-based drugs are recognized by the suffix, -mab, preceded by a source infix such as -xi- (chimeric), -zu- (humanized) or -u- (human) designating the species from which the antibody was derived. However, many technological advances have made it increasingly difficult to accurately capture an antibody's source in its name. In 2014, the WHO and the United States Adopted Names (USAN) Council approached this challenge by implementing changes to antibody source infix definitions. Unfortunately, gaps and ambiguities in the definitions and procedures resulted in inconsistent source category assignments and widespread confusion. The Antibody Society, extensively supported by academic and industry scientists, voiced concerns leading to constructive dialog during scheduled consultations with WHO and USAN Council representatives. In June 2017, the WHO announced that use of the source infix will be discontinued for new antibody INNs effective immediately. We fully support this change as it better aligns antibody INNs with current and foreseeable future innovations in antibody therapeutics. Here we review the changes implemented. Additionally, we analyzed antibody INNs recently assigned under the previous 2014 definitions and provide recommendations for further alignment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.