ArticleJournal of comparative effectiveness research2017
Strengthening stakeholder-engaged research and research on stakeholder engagement.
Article in Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence Map of Cochrane Reviews on Nutrition and Physical Activity in Healthy and At-Risk Populations: A Scoping Review.Journal of prevention (2022) · 2026Review
- Exploring Stakeholder Involvement in Intervention Implementation Studies: Systematic Evidence Synthesis With an Evidence Gap Map Approach.Evaluation & the health professions · 2026Review
- Advancing knowledge translation processes in motor rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy and developmental coordination disorder: insights from a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Personalised prevention: what patients and citizen advocates want for better engagement - a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Advancing equity in cancer research through principled partnership: stakeholder engagement practices in The Social Interventions for Support during Treatment for Endometrial cancer and Recurrence (SISTER) Study.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Doing community involvement care-fully: using an ethic of care to guide involvement in research on women's health after pregnancy complications and loss.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- The transdisciplinary research process and participatory research approaches used in the field of neglected tropical diseases: A scoping review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Coproducing a Cochrane Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Process, Outcomes, and Reflections on Power.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2025Article
- Measuring Outcomes for Community Partner Engagement: The Case of the High-Fidelity Wraparound Program for Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025Article
- Using Stakeholder Engagement to Build Cancer Survivorship Care Coordination Capacity Between Primary and Oncology Care.Health equity · 2025Article
- Evaluation means making CQI collaborative (E = MCJournal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Engaging patient and community stakeholders in the optimization of the Compassionate And Loving Mindset towards heart health risk (CALM Hearts) physical activity intervention: a description of initial work and protocol for future engagement activities.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- The impact of MAMCA as a stakeholder engagement tool during the setup of an energy community.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Community Engagement in Implementation Science: the Impact of Community Engagement Activities in the DECIPHeR Alliance.Ethnicity & disease · 2023Article
- Leveling the Research Playing Field: Decolonizing Global Health Research Through Web-Based Platforms.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Improving teamwork in multidisciplinary cross-sector teams: Adaption and pilot testing of a team training for Child Advocacy Center teams.Children and youth services review · 2023Article
- Stakeholder engagement in European brain research: Experiences of the Lifebrain consortium.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Team-focused implementation strategies to improve implementation of mental health screening and referral in rural Children's Advocacy Centers: study protocol for a pilot cluster randomized hybrid type 2 trial.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Scoping review of models and frameworks of patient engagement in health services research.BMJ open · 2022Article
- PROTOCOL: Barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in health guideline development: A qualitative evidence synthesis.Campbell systematic reviews · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stakeholder engagement is an emerging field with little evidence to inform best practices. Guidelines are needed to improve the quality of research on stakeholder engagement through more intentional planning, evaluation and reporting. We developed a preliminary framework for planning, evaluating and reporting stakeholder engagement, informed by published conceptual models and recommendations and then refined through our own stakeholder engagement experience. Our proposed exploratory framework highlights contexts and processes to be addressed in planning stakeholder engagement, and potential immediate, intermediate and long-term outcomes that warrant evaluation. We use this framework to illustrate both the minimum information needed for reporting stakeholder-engaged research and the comprehensive detail needed for reporting research on stakeholder engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.