Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28621318›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2017

Natural killer-like signature observed post therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer is a determinant of pathological response and improved survival.

Matthew Alderdice, Philip D Dunne, Aidan J Cole, Paul G O'Reilly, Darragh G McArt, Vicky Bingham, Marc-Aurel Fuchs, Stephen McQuaid, Maurice B Loughrey, Graeme I Murray and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Radiation-induced changes in gene expression in rectal cancer specimens.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew AlderdiceNorthern Ireland Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Philip D DunneCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Aidan J ColeCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Paul G O'ReillyCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Darragh G McArtNorthern Ireland Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Vicky BinghamNorthern Ireland Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Marc-Aurel FuchsNorthern Ireland Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Stephen McQuaidNorthern Ireland Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Maurice B LoughreyCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Graeme I MurrayDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Leslie M SamuelDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.
Mark LawlerCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Richard H WilsonCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Manuel Salto-TellezNorthern Ireland Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Vicky M CoyleCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Belfast Health and Social Care Trust · GBNHS Grampian · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 20256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Around 12-15% of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergo a pathologically complete response (tumor regression grade 4) to long-course preoperative chemoradiotherapy; the remainder exhibit a spectrum of tumor regression (tumor regression grade 1-3). Understanding therapy-related transcriptional alterations may enable better prediction of response as measured by progression-free and overall survival, in addition to aiding the development of improved strategies based on the underlying biology of the disease. To this end, we performed high-throughput gene expression profiling in 40 pairs of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded rectal cancer biopsies and matched resections following long-course preoperative chemoradiotherapy (discovery cohort). Differential gene expression analysis was performed contrasting tumor regression grades in resections. Enumeration of the tumor microenvironment cell population was undertaken using in silico analysis of the transcriptional data, and real-time PCR validation of NCR1 undertaken. Immunohistochemistry and survival analysis was used to measure CD56+ cell populations in an independent cohort (n=150). Gene expression traits observed following long-course preoperative chemoradiotherapy in the discovery cohort suggested an increased abundance of natural killer cells in tumors that displayed a clinical response to CRT in a tumor regression grade-dependent manner. CD56+ natural killer-cell populations were measured by immunohistochemistry and found to be significantly higher in tumor regression grade 3 patients compared with tumor regression grade 1-2 in the validation cohort. Furthermore, it was observed that patients positive for CD56 cells after therapy had a better overall survival (HR=0.282, 95% CI=0.109-0.729, χ

Indexed as

Chemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantNeoadjuvant TherapyTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyCD56 AntigenChi-Square DistributionGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKiller Cells, NaturalLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingNeoplasm GradingPredictive Value of TestsProportional Hazards ModelsBiomarkers, TumorCD56 AntigenNCAM1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28621318
OpenAlexW2625828870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.