ArticleNature communications2017
Dependence of the shape of graphene nanobubbles on trapped substance.
Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Viscous fingering instabilities in spontaneously formed blisters of MoSNanoscale advances · 2023Article
- Strong and Localized Luminescence from Interface Bubbles Between Stacked hBN Multilayers.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Breakdown of Universal Scaling for Nanometer-Sized Bubbles in Graphene.Nano letters · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Heterogeneous deformation of two-dimensional materials for emerging functionalities.Journal of materials research · 2020Article
- MD simulation of methane adsorption properties on pillared graphene bubble models.Journal of molecular modeling · 2019Article
- Programmable graphene nanobubbles with three-fold symmetric pseudo-magnetic fields.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Cleaning interfaces in layered materials heterostructures.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Mechanics of spontaneously formed nanoblisters trapped by transferred 2D crystals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Van der Waals (vdW) interaction between two-dimensional crystals (2D) can trap substances in high pressurized (of order 1 GPa) on nanobubbles. Increasing the adhesion between the 2D crystals further enhances the pressure and can lead to a phase transition of the trapped material. We found that the shape of the nanobubble can depend critically on the properties of the trapped substance. In the absence of any residual strain in the top 2D crystal, flat nanobubbles can be formed by trapped long hydrocarbons (that is, hexadecane). For large nanobubbles with radius 130 nm, our atomic force microscopy measurements show nanobubbles filled with hydrocarbons (water) have a cylindrical symmetry (asymmetric) shape which is in good agreement with our molecular dynamics simulations. This study provides insights into the effects of the specific material and the vdW pressure on the microscopic details of graphene bubbles.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.