ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2018
Levator ani defects and the severity of symptoms in women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of levator ani muscle avulsions on Manchester procedure outcomes: A 5-year follow-up study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Subclassification of second-degree tears at delivery: creation and reported outcomes.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Impact of 3D Reconstruction Combined with Engineering Software Analysis of Pelvic Floor Muscle Morphology on Sexual Dysfunction in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Urologia internationalis · 2025Article
- Effects of yoga on the intervention of levator ani hiatus in postpartum women: a prospective study.Journal of physical therapy science · 2021Article
- Ultrasound imaging of maternal birth trauma.International urogynecology journal · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsions in a selected cohort of patients with primary anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and to assess whether LAM avulsions, as an independent factor, affect the degree of POP symptoms and sexual dysfunction. Additionally, clinical and demographic variables of women with and those without avulsions were compared.
methodsWe carried out a cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort study including 197 women scheduled for anterior compartment POP surgery. LAM avulsions were diagnosed on transperineal 4D ultrasound. Preoperative symptom severity and sexual dysfunction were evaluated using validated questionnaires (Pelvic Floor Disability Index [PFDI-20] and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-Short Form 12 [PISQ-12]). Linear regression was performed with avulsion as the main independent variable against total PFDI-20 and domain scores, bulge symptoms, and PISQ-12 score. Clinical and demographic variables for women with and without avulsions were compared using independent samples t test, Mann-Whitney U test or Chi-squared test.
resultsThe prevalence of LAM avulsions was 50.3%. Avulsions were not associated with symptom severity or sexual dysfunction. "Chronic disease causing pain, fatigue or increased intra-abdominal pressure" was the only independent factor associated with all domains of the PFDI-20. Women with avulsions were younger at presentation, older at their first delivery, had lower BMI, and more often had a history of forceps delivery (p < 0.01).
conclusionsLAM avulsions were highly prevalent in this preoperative POP cohort. Avulsions were not associated with the severity of POP symptoms or sexual dysfunction. Women with avulsions seem to require fewer additional cofactors for developing POP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.