Observational studyJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2017
Preliminary data on utility of subcutaneous unfractionated heparin in patients with deep cerebral venous thrombosis.
Observational study in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors, changes in serum inflammatory factors, and clinical prevention and control measures for puerperal infection.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
- Unilateral Papilledema in Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis.Journal of neurosciences in rural practice · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (SCUFH) has been proved effective in puerperal cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), but its efficacy in the more serious form of the disease such as deep CVT patients (DCVT) unreported. We describe the outcomes of 37 (isolated:combined: 11:26) patients of DCVT diagnosed by MRI, treated with SCUFH in a tertiary care stroke unit. It was a prospective observational cohort study using 5000 U of SCUFH every 6 hourly for 10 days with oral Acenocoumarol started on day 7, with monitoring. The outcome was assessed by modified Rankin scale (mRS), National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Barthel's activities of daily life (BADL) at 3 months. The mean age of the cohort was 27.9 ± 9.7 years, females (n = 24) outnumbering the males (n = 13). Mean duration of symptoms being 10.2 ± 15.9 days. MRI showed vein of Galen and straight sinus involvement in 36 (97.3%) patients, with sparing of the basal vein of Rosenthal in 28 (75%). Thalamus 27 (73%) basal ganglia 21 (56.7%) were commonly involved areas with hemorrhagic lesions in 18 (48.6%) patients. The median NIHSS score at presentation was 11 (1-21). Mean duration of SCUFH treatment was 9.3 ± 1.3 days and the mean aPTT on day 7 was 49.3 ± 9.8 s (control 32-39 s), mean PT INR on day 13 was 1.5 ± 0.45. All the patients improved with no mortality in the study group. At 3 months, good functional outcome (mRS: 0-2) was observed in 94.6% (n = 35) of patients. Two patients had mRS-3. The median mRS (3{1-5} to 0{0-3}) and BADL (8{0-20} to 20{8-20}) improved at 3 months. Complications seen were thrombocytopenia-1, infection-6 and deep vein thrombosis of leg-4. Our preliminary data suggests that SCUFH is safe, effective treatment option in patients with DCVT in a stroke unit with minimal monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.