Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28620637›Full record

ArticleJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)2017

Evaluation of the Effects of Three Plant Species (

Maryam Alsadat Hashemipour, Sodabeh Lotfi, Molok Torabi, Fariba Sharifi, Mehdi Ansari, Amirreza Ghassemi, Saied Sheikhshoaie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Effects of Myrtus (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Efficacy ofInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2024
    Article
  7. Effect ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  8. Myrtle: a versatile medicinal plant.Nutrire : revista de Sociedade Brasileira de Alimentacao e Nutricao = journal of the Brazilian Society of Food and Nutrition · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Camellia Sinensis Mouthwashes in Oral Care: a Systematic Review.Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Antioxidant Activity ofMedicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maryam Alsadat HashemipourOral and Dental Disease Research Center and Dept. of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Sodabeh LotfiKerman Social Determinants on Oral Health Research Center and Dept. of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Molok TorabiDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Fariba SharifiDept. of Pharmaceutics, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Mehdi AnsariDept. of Pharmaceutics, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Amirreza GhassemiPeriodontic Resident, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, United States.
Saied SheikhshoaieNeuroscience Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

statement of the problemUse of traditional medicine to relieve human sufferings has a very long history. The effects of these plants in wound curing and subsequently making the best mucosa patch for treatment of oral ulcers is still under investigation. PURPOSE: The main goal of present research work is to assess the efficacy of MATERIALS AND

methodIn this study, 60 healthy adult male rats in 5 groups were investigated. A wound with 2 mm diameter was punched into the hard palate of each rat. For topical application, a mucosa patch of materials or blank was packed into the wound. Histological samples were harvested on post injury days 2, 4, 6, and 8.

resultsThis study showed that there were no significant differences between groups in the reduction of weight. Comparison of clinical wound size showed that group

conclusionThe results of the present study showed that

Indexed as

HealingMouthPlantUlcerWound

Identifiers

PMID28620637
PMCPMC5463770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.