Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28620526›Full record

ReviewFertility research and practice2016

Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice.

Tamara Tobias, Fady I Sharara, Jason M Franasiak, Patrick W Heiser, Emily Pinckney-Clark

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fertility research and practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tamara TobiasSeattle Reproductive Medicine, 1505 Westlake Ave North, Suite 400, Seattle, WA 98109 USA.
Fady I ShararaVirginia Center for Reproductive Medicine, 11150 Sunset Hills Rd, Suite #100, Reston, VA 20190 USA.
Jason M FranasiakDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, 125 Paterson St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA.
Patrick W HeiserFerring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 100 Interpace Parkway, Parsippany, NJ 07054 USA.
Emily Pinckney-ClarkFerring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 100 Interpace Parkway, Parsippany, NJ 07054 USA.
Ferring Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USSeattle Reproductive Medicine · USVirginia Center for Reproductive Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transfer of multiple embryos after in vitro fertilization (IVF) increases the risk of twins and higher-order births. Multiple births are associated with significant health risks and maternal and neonatal complications, as well as physical, emotional, and financial stresses that can strain families and increase the incidence of depression and anxiety disorders in parents. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) is among the most effective methods to reduce the risk of multiple births with IVF. MAIN BODY: Current societal guidelines recommend eSET for patients <35 years of age with a good prognosis, yet even this approach is not widely applied. Many patients and clinicians have been reluctant to adopt eSET due to studies reporting higher live birth rates with the transfer of two or more embryos rather than eSET. Additional barriers to eSET include risk of treatment dropout after embryo transfer failure, patient preference for twins, a lack of knowledge about the risks and complications associated with multiple births, and the high costs of multiple IVF cycles. This review provides a comprehensive summary of strategies to increase the rate of eSET, including personalized counseling, access to educational information regarding the risks of multiple pregnancies and births, financial incentives, and tools to help predict the chances of IVF success. The use of comprehensive chromosomal screening to improve embryo selection has been shown to improve eSET outcomes and may increase acceptance of eSET.

conclusionseSET is an effective method for reducing multiple pregnancies resulting from IVF. Although several factors may impede the adoption of eSET, there are a number of strategies and tools that may encourage the more widespread adoption of eSET in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Assisted reproductive technologiesComprehensive chromosomal screeningElective single embryo transferMultiple birthsPatient education

Identifiers

PMID28620526
PMCPMC5424309
OpenAlexW2525757603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.