Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28620441›Full record

ReviewThe EPMA journal2017

Impaired wound healing: facts and hypotheses for multi-professional considerations in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine.

Eden Avishai, Kristina Yeghiazaryan, Olga Golubnitschaja

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The EPMA journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Association of Obesity and Body Composition and Hospitalization Risk with Infection in the CRIC Study.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eden AvishaiRappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
Kristina YeghiazaryanRadiological Clinic, Medical Faculty, Friedrich-Wilhels-University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
Olga GolubnitschajaRadiological Clinic, Medical Faculty, Friedrich-Wilhels-University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whereas the physiologic wound healing (WH) successfully proceeds through the clearly defined sequence of the individual phases of wound healing, chronic non-healing wounds/ulcers fail to complete the individual stages and the entire healing process. There are many risk factors both modifiable (such as stress, smoking, inappropriate alcohol consumption, malnutrition, obesity, diabetes, cardio-vascular disease, etc.) and non-modifiable (such as genetic diseases and ageing) strongly contributing to the impaired WH. Current statistics demonstrate that both categories are increasingly presented in the populations, which causes dramatic socio-economic burden to the healthcare sector and society at large. Consequently, innovative concepts by predictive, preventive and personalised medicine are crucial to be implemented in the area. Individual risk factors, causality, functional interrelationships, molecular signature, predictive diagnosis, and primary and secondary prevention are thoroughly analysed followed by the expert recommendations in this paper.

Indexed as

CancerCardio-vascular diseaseDiabetesFlammer syndromeImpaired healingPredictive preventive personalised medicineWound

Identifiers

PMID28620441
PMCPMC5471802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.