Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28620291›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2017

Network-Wide Adaptive Burst Detection Depicts Neuronal Activity with Improved Accuracy.

Inkeri A Välkki, Kerstin Lenk, Jarno E Mikkonen, Fikret E Kapucu, Jari A K Hyttinen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neural Coding With Bursts-Current State and Future Perspectives.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Inkeri A VälkkiBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Tampere University of TechnologyTampere, Finland.
Kerstin LenkBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Tampere University of TechnologyTampere, Finland.
Jarno E MikkonenDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systems, University of JyväskyläJyväskylä, Finland.
Fikret E KapucuBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Tampere University of TechnologyTampere, Finland.
Jari A K HyttinenBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Tampere University of TechnologyTampere, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal networks are often characterized by their spiking and bursting statistics. Previously, we introduced an adaptive burst analysis method which enhances the analysis power for neuronal networks with highly varying firing dynamics. The adaptation is based on single channels analyzing each element of a network separately. Such kind of analysis was adequate for the assessment of local behavior, where the analysis focuses on the neuronal activity in the vicinity of a single electrode. However, the assessment of the whole network may be hampered, if parts of the network are analyzed using different rules. Here, we test how using multiple channels and measurement time points affect adaptive burst detection. The main emphasis is, if network-wide adaptive burst detection can provide new insights into the assessment of network activity. Therefore, we propose a modification to the previously introduced inter-spike interval (ISI) histogram based cumulative moving average (CMA) algorithm to analyze multiple spike trains simultaneously. The network size can be freely defined, e.g., to include all the electrodes in a microelectrode array (MEA) recording. Additionally, the method can be applied on a series of measurements on the same network to pool the data for statistical analysis. Firstly, we apply both the original CMA-algorithm and our proposed network-wide CMA-algorithm on artificial spike trains to investigate how the modification changes the burst detection. Thereafter, we use the algorithms on MEA data of spontaneously active chemically manipulated

Indexed as

burst detectionburst synchronymicroelectrode arraysnetwork classificationneuronal networks

Identifiers

PMID28620291
PMCPMC5450420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.