Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28620137›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Biological specificity of CDK4/6 inhibitors: dose response relationship, in vivo signaling, and composite response signature.

Erik S Knudsen, Jack Hutcheson, Paris Vail, Agnieszka K Witkiewicz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cancers · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Metabolic Response to CDK4/6 Inhibition in ER+ Breast Cancer Creates a Therapeutic Vulnerability in Drug-Tolerant Persister Cells.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erik S KnudsenUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Jack Hutcheson
Paris VailUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Agnieszka K WitkiewiczUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.
University of Arizona · USUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center

Funding

Pathway Heterogeneity: Etiology and Treatment of TNBCR01CA188650 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI KNUDSEN, ERIK · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Impact of ErbB2 and RB Pathways on DCIS Progression and TreatmentR01CA163863 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI WITKIEWICZ, AGNIESZKA · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163863NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently developed potent and selective CDK4/6 inhibitors fall into two classes based on structure and toxicity profiles in clinical studies. One class, exemplified by palbociclib and ribociclib, exhibits neutropenia as a dose-limiting toxicity and requires discontinuous dosing. In contrast, the structurally distinct CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib is dosed continuously, and has diarrhea and fatigue as dose-limiting toxicities. In preclinical models, palbociclib has been extensively studied and induces cell cycle inhibition in an RB-dependent manner. Thus far, abemaciclib has been less extensively evaluated. We found that abemaciclib cell cycle inhibitory activity is RB-dependent at clinically achievable concentrations. Abemaciclib elicited potent suppression of RB/E2F regulated genes associated with prognosis in ER-positive breast cancer. However, unlike palbociclib, at 250nM-1 µM doses abemaciclib induced cell death in RB-deficient cell lines. This response was associated with a rapidly-induced multi-vacuolar phenotype indicative of lysosomal membrane permeabilization that could be ameliorated with chloroquine. This event was not a reflection of inhibition of other CDK family members, but could be recapitulated with CBX4945 that inhibits casein and DYRK/HIPK kinases. To determine if these "off-target" features of abemaciclib were observed in vivo, mice harboring matched RB-positive and negative xenografts were treated with palbociclib and abemaciclib. In vivo, all of the apparent activity of abemaciclib was RB-dependent and strongly elicited suppression of cell cycle regulatory genes in a fashion markedly similar to palbociclib. Using gene expression data from cell lines and tumors treated with abemaciclib and palbociclib a composite signature of response to CDK4/6 inhibition was developed that included many genes that are individually required for tumor cell proliferation or viability. These data indicate that while abemaciclib and palbociclib can exert distinct biological and molecular effects, there are common gene expression features that could be broadly utilized in measuring the response to CDK4/6 inhibition.

Indexed as

AminopyridinesAntineoplastic AgentsBenzimidazolesCell CycleCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationComputational BiologyCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Dose-Response Relationship, DrugE2F Transcription FactorsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansPiperazinesabemaciclibAminopyridinesAntineoplastic AgentsBenzimidazolesCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6E2F Transcription FactorspalbociclibPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridinesabemaciclibbreast cancerCDK4E2Fpalbociclib

Identifiers

PMID28620137
PMCPMC5546433
OpenAlexW2623012037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.