Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28620089›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2017

Development and validation of risk prediction equations to estimate survival in patients with colorectal cancer: cohort study.

Julia Hippisley-Cox, Carol Coupland

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Meta-analysis of aspirin-guided therapy of colorectal cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. From algorithms to action: improving patient care requires causality.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Development of Predictive Models for Survival among Women with Breast Cancer in Malaysia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia Hippisley-CoxDivision of Primary Care, University Park, Nottingham NG2 7RD, UK julia.hippisley-cox@nottingham.ac.uk.
Carol CouplandDivision of Primary Care, University Park, Nottingham NG2 7RD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesColorectal NeoplasmsComorbidityDatabases, FactualDiabetes MellitusEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28620089
PMCPMC5471851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.