Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28619837›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Differentiation between Treatment-Induced Necrosis and Recurrent Tumors in Patients with Metastatic Brain Tumors: Comparison among

N Tomura, M Kokubun, T Saginoya, Y Mizuno, Y Kikuchi

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. [Cancers · 2021
    Article
  20. [EJNMMI research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N TomuraFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology, Radiology, and Neurosurgery, Southern Tohoku Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama City, Fukushima, Japan. tomura@bloom.ocn.ne.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3153-0410
M KokubunFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology, Radiology, and Neurosurgery, Southern Tohoku Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama City, Fukushima, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7468-1887
T SaginoyaFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology, Radiology, and Neurosurgery, Southern Tohoku Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama City, Fukushima, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8985-383X
Y MizunoFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology, Radiology, and Neurosurgery, Southern Tohoku Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama City, Fukushima, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3030-1958
Y KikuchiFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology, Radiology, and Neurosurgery, Southern Tohoku Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama City, Fukushima, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1161-7500
Southern Tohoku General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIn patients with metastatic brain tumors after gamma knife radiosurgery, the superiority of PET using MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study analyzed 18 lesions from 15 patients with metastatic brain tumors who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery. Ten lesions were identified as recurrent tumors by an operation. In MR permeability imaging, the transfer constant between intra- and extravascular extracellular spaces (/minute), extravascular extracellular space, the transfer constant from the extravascular extracellular space to plasma (/minute), the initial area under the signal intensity-time curve, contrast-enhancement ratio, bolus arrival time (seconds), maximum slope of increase (millimole/second), and fractional plasma volume were calculated. ADC was also acquired. On both PET using

resultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for differentiating radiation necrosis from recurrent tumors was the best for the

conclusionsThe present study suggests that PET using

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsCarbon RadioisotopesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNecrosisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeuroimagingPositron-Emission TomographyRadiation InjuriesRadiosurgeryCarbon-11Carbon Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID28619837
PMCPMC7960436
OpenAlexW2625678162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.