Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28619529›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychologia2017

On the partnership between neural representations of object categories and visual features in the ventral visual pathway.

Stefania Bracci, J Brendan Ritchie, Hans Op de Beeck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Core dimensions of human material perception.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Scope and Limits of Fine-Grained Image and Category Information in the Ventral Visual Pathway.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Graspable foods and tools elicit similar responses in visual cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Graspable foods and tools elicit similar responses in visual cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. A Texture Statistics Encoding Model Reveals Hierarchical Feature Selectivity across Human Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Category Trumps Shape as an Organizational Principle of Object Space in the Human Occipitotemporal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Recognition of natural objects in the archerfish.The Journal of experimental biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefania BracciBrain and Cognition, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J Brendan RitchieBrain and Cognition, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hans Op de BeeckBrain and Cognition, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: hans.opdebeeck@kuleuven.be.

Funding

European Research Council 284101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A dominant view in the cognitive neuroscience of object vision is that regions of the ventral visual pathway exhibit some degree of category selectivity. However, recent findings obtained with multivariate pattern analyses (MVPA) suggest that apparent category selectivity in these regions is dependent on more basic visual features of stimuli. In which case a rethinking of the function and organization of the ventral pathway may be in order. We suggest that addressing this issue of functional specificity requires clear coding hypotheses, about object category and visual features, which make contrasting predictions about neuroimaging results in ventral pathway regions. One way to differentiate between categorical and featural coding hypotheses is to test for residual categorical effects: effects of category selectivity that cannot be accounted for by visual features of stimuli. A strong method for testing these effects, we argue, is to make object category and target visual features orthogonal in stimulus design. Recent studies that adopt this approach support a feature-based categorical coding hypothesis according to which regions of the ventral stream do indeed code for object category, but in a format at least partially based on the visual features of stimuli.

Indexed as

Brain MappingHumansPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationVisual CortexVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID28619529
PMCPMC5680697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.