Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28619191›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2017

Outcomes of PCI in Relation to Procedural Characteristics and Operator Volumes in the United States.

Alexander C Fanaroff, Pearl Zakroysky, David Dai, Daniel Wojdyla, Matthew W Sherwood, Matthew T Roe, Tracy Y Wang, Eric D Peterson, Hitinder S Gurm, Mauricio G Cohen and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Challenges Facing Contemporary Interventional Cardiology.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Interventions for adult congenital heart disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Retrospective Analysis of the Thai Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry: Impacts of Center Volume and Operator Experience on Outcomes.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Is more better? A multilevel analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention hospital openings and closures on patient volumes.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alexander C FanaroffDivision of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: alexander.fanaroff@duke.edu.
Pearl ZakroyskyDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
David DaiDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Daniel WojdylaDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Matthew W SherwoodDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Cardiology, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia.
Matthew T RoeDivision of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Tracy Y WangDivision of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Eric D PetersonDivision of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Hitinder S GurmDivision of Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Mauricio G CohenCardiovascular Division, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
John C MessengerDivision of Cardiology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Sunil V RaoDivision of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Cardiovascular Clinical ResearchT32HL069749 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2003 to 2023
$6.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProfessional guidelines have reduced the recommended minimum number to an average of 50 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures performed annually by each operator. Operator volume patterns and associated outcomes since this change are unknown.

objectivesThe authors describe herein PCI operator procedure volumes; characteristics of low-, intermediate-, and high-volume operators; and the relationship between operator volume and clinical outcomes in a large, contemporary, nationwide sample.

methodsUsing data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry collected between July 1, 2009, and March 31, 2015, we examined operator annual PCI volume. We divided operators into low- (<50 PCIs per year), intermediate- (50 to 100 PCIs per year), and high- (>100 PCIs per year) volume groups, and determined the adjusted association between annual PCI volume and in-hospital outcomes, including mortality.

resultsThe median annual number of procedures performed per operator was 59; 44% of operators performed <50 PCI procedures per year. Low-volume operators more frequently performed emergency and primary PCI procedures and practiced at hospitals with lower annual PCI volumes. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was 1.86% for low-volume operators, 1.73% for intermediate-volume operators, and 1.48% for high-volume operators. The adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality was higher for PCI procedures performed by low- and intermediate-volume operators compared with those performed by high-volume operators (adjusted odds ratio: 1.16 for low versus high; adjusted odds ratio: 1.05 for intermediate vs. high volume) as was the risk for new dialysis post PCI. No volume relationship was observed for post-PCI bleeding.

conclusionsMany PCI operators in the United States are performing fewer than the recommended number of PCI procedures annually. Although absolute risk differences are small and may be partially explained by unmeasured differences in case mix between operators, there remains an inverse relationship between PCI operator volume and in-hospital mortality that persisted in risk-adjusted analyses.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionRegistriesAgedFemaleHospital MortalityHospitals, High-VolumeHospitals, Low-VolumeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionOdds RatioRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeUnited Statesbleedingmortalitymyocardial infarctionvolume-outcome relationship

Identifiers

PMID28619191
PMCPMC5784411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.