Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28619034›Full record

Trial reportReproductive health2017

Evaluation of two intervention models on contraceptive attitudes and behaviors among nulliparous women in Shanghai, China: a clustered randomized controlled trial.

Yuan He, Ning Zhang, Jue Wang, Na He, Yan Du, Jing-Xin Ding, Ying Zhang, Xiao-Tian Li, Jian Huang, Ke-Qin Hua

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuan HeDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Ning ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Jue WangDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Na HeDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Fudan University School of Public Health, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yan DuDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Jing-Xin DingDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Ying ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Xiao-Tian LiDepartment of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Jian HuangDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Ke-Qin HuaDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China. huakeqin@126.com.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith increasing acceptance of premarital sex among young Chinese women, the rates of unintended pregnancies and induced abortions are becoming alarmingly high, suggesting the needs of educating women with adequate contraceptive knowledge and providing them with accessible contraceptive services. Previous studies have shown that knowledge and attitudes towards contraception could be modified through intervention strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of two community intervention models on modifying contraceptive attitudes and behaviors among nulliparous women.

methodsIn this clustered randomized controlled trial, nulliparous women aged 18-40 years from 18 communities were enrolled and randomized to either the traditional community intervention model (TC model) or the more comprehensive new community-based intervention model (NC model) with a ratio of 1:2. Contraceptive attitudes and behaviors were assessed before and after the interventions.

resultsA total of 901 nulliparous women were followed. The most common contraceptive method in both groups was condom (approximately 80%) before or after interventions. The rates of using effective contraceptive methods were very low (<5%) even after the intervention. Comparing the NC with TC group, the adjusted ORs and 95% CIs regarding natural family planning, emergency contraceptive usage and short-acting OCPs were1.53 (95% CI: 1.11-2.13), 2.87 (95% CI: 2.05-4.02), and 2.71 (95% CI: 1.65-4.47), respectively; while the ORs and 95%CIs of gynecological examination and contraceptive use were 2.31 (95% CI: 1.63-3.27) and 2.89 (95% CI: 1.98-4.23), respectively. No statistical significant difference was found for the use of effective contraceptive methods at post-intervention among the two models.

conclusionsHigh proportions of nulliparous women held negative attitudes and behaviors towards effective contraceptive methods. The NC model, integrating existing health resources, had more positive influence than the TC model on the favorable contraceptive attitudes and behaviors towards the use of any contraceptive methods, but had limited impact on the use of effective contraceptive methods. Our study suggested the feasibility of applying the NC model in Shanghai. Interventions on contraceptive attitudes and behaviors should base on the existing health service system, synthesize resources and selectively apply to populations with distinct characteristics.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorParityAdolescentAdultAttitude to HealthChinaContraceptionFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedClustered randomized controlled trialCommunity interventionContraceptive attitudes and behaviorsNulliparous women

Identifiers

PMID28619034
PMCPMC5472977
OpenAlexW2625826673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.