Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28619019›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2017

Life after prostate cancer treatment: a mixed methods study of the experiences of men with sexual dysfunction and their partners.

Jeffrey A Albaugh, Nat Sufrin, Brittany R Lapin, Jacqueline Petkewicz, Sandi Tenfelde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Relationship Values and Committed Actions Among Couples Coping with Prostate Cancer: A Qualitative Study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The interplay and influence of anxiety and depression among men with early-stage prostate cancer and their close allies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. The lived experiences and unmet needs of prostate and colorectal male cancer survivors in rural Virginia: A qualitative study.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Exploring the role of psychological flexibility in relationship functioning among couples coping with prostate cancer: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2022
    Article
  19. Unmet supportive care needs in prostate cancer survivors with advanced disease: A mixed-methods exploration.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey A AlbaughJohn and Carol Walter Center for Urological Health, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 2180 Pfingsten Road, Suite 3000, Glenview, Illinois, 60026, USA. jalbaugh@northshore.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2242-7876
Nat SufrinThe Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Brittany R LapinCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jacqueline PetkewiczJohn and Carol Walter Center for Urological Health, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 2180 Pfingsten Road, Suite 3000, Glenview, Illinois, 60026, USA.
Sandi TenfeldeThe Marcella Niehoff School of Nursing, Loyola University of Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA.
NorthShore University HealthSystem · USCity College of New York · USCleveland Clinic · USLoyola University Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer is the most common non-skin cancer in men and sexual dysfunction is the most frequently reported long-term side effect of prostate cancer surgery or radiation. The aim of this study was to examine the experiences of men with sexual dysfunction and their partners following prostate cancer treatment.

methodsMen with sexual dysfunction from either surgical removal or radiation therapy 1-5 years after treatment were interviewed, as well as their partners. A mixed method design was used to determine the lived experience of men with sexual dysfunction. Open-ended questions guided the interviews.

resultsTwenty seven men completed the study with a mean age of 61 years (SD = 8.0; range = 44-77 years). Nine partners also participated. The majority of men (92.6%) had surgery. The average time from treatment to the interview was 23.5 months (SD = 11.7). Themes were frustration with sexual dysfunction, importance of support and understanding from others, depression and anxiety related to sexual dysfunction, importance of intimacy with partner, factors that impact treatment satisfaction, and education and comprehensive information about sex.

conclusionsProstate cancer survivors and partners need accurate information about sexual side effects before during and after treatment. Men and partners required individualized help and guidance to manage sexual dysfunction. Support and understanding from partners, family, and others was also identified as an important aspect of healing and adjustment after prostate cancer treatment. Prostate cancer education/support groups played a key role in helping men and partners gain advocacy, education, and support. Psychological problems such as depression and anxiety need to be identified and addressed in men after prostate cancer treatment. Men and partners need assistance in understanding and navigating their way through intimacy to move forward with connectedness in their relationship. Satisfaction with treatment and with providers is dependent on patient education and understanding of all aspects of prostate cancer treatment including sexual side effects and incontinence.

Indexed as

Sexual PartnersSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsSexual BehaviorSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalTreatment OutcomeMale cancersPhenomenologyProstate cancerQualitative researchSexual dysfunctionSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID28619019
PMCPMC5472970
OpenAlexW2626263008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.