Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28618896›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine2017

Managing risk during care transitions when approaching end of life: A qualitative study of patients' and health care professionals' decision making.

Maureen A Coombs, Roses Parker, Kay de Vries

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Who Gets to Determine Whether Home Is "Unsafe" at the End of Life?Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maureen A Coombs1 Graduate School of Nursing Midwifery and Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Roses Parker1 Graduate School of Nursing Midwifery and Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Kay de Vries3 School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing importance is being placed on the coordination of services at the end of life.

aimTo describe decision-making processes that influence transitions in care when approaching the end of life.

designQualitative study using field observations and longitudinal semi-structured interviews. SETTING/

participantsField observations were undertaken in three sites: a residential care home, a medical assessment unit and a general medical unit in New Zealand. The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool was used to identify participants with advanced and progressive illness. Patients and family members were interviewed on recruitment and 3-4 months later. Four weeks of fieldwork were conducted in each site. A total of 40 interviews were conducted: 29 initial interviews and 11 follow-up interviews. Thematic analysis was undertaken.

findingsManaging risk was an important factor that influenced transitions in care. Patients and health care staff held different perspectives on how such risks were managed. At home, patients tolerated increasing risk and used specific support measures to manage often escalating health and social problems. In contrast, decisions about discharge in hospital were driven by hospital staff who were risk-adverse. Availability of community and carer services supported risk management while a perceived need for early discharge decision making in hospital and making 'safe' discharge options informed hospital discharge decisions.

conclusionWhile managing risk is an important factor during care transitions, patients should be able to make choices on how to live with risk at the end of life. This requires reconsideration of transitional care and current discharge planning processes at the end of life.

Indexed as

Decision MakingRisk ManagementAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFamilyFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandPatient PreferencePatientsQualitative ResearchTerminal Careadvanced and progressive diseasecommunitydischarge/admissionhospitalPatient choicerisktransitions in care/transfer

Identifiers

PMID28618896
PMCPMC5476192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.