Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28618351›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2017

Structure of IP

Mariah R Baker, Guizhen Fan, Irina I Serysheva

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Potential Roles of IPBiomolecules · 2024
    Review
  5. Understanding IPCell calcium · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Functional determination of calcium-binding sites required for the activation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. IP3R Channels in Male Reproduction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. The Ion Channel and GPCR Toolkit of Brain Capillary Pericytes.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mariah R BakerStructural Biology Imaging Center, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Guizhen FanStructural Biology Imaging Center, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Irina I SeryshevaStructural Biology Imaging Center, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Electronic address: irina.i.serysheva@uth.tmc.edu.
Imaging Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Structure-Function Studies Of IP3R ChannelsR01GM072804 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI SERYSHEVA, IRINA I · 2005 to 2023
$4.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCryoelectron MicroscopyHumansInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate ReceptorsProtein DomainsSignal-To-Noise RatioInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptors

Identifiers

PMID28618351
PMCPMC5683905
OpenAlexW2625118906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.