Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28618095›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2017

A qualitative formative evaluation of a patient-centred patient safety intervention delivered in collaboration with hospital volunteers.

Gemma Louch, Jane O'Hara, Mohammed A Mohammed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The challenges of voluntary care provision for hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A qualitative study of the public volunteers' experiences.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. "Change is what can actually make the tough times better": A patient-centred patient safety intervention delivered in collaboration with hospital volunteers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
  7. A qualitative formative evaluation of a patient-centred patient safety intervention delivered in collaboration with hospital volunteers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gemma LouchBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6946-3693
Jane O'HaraBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
Mohammed A MohammedBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence suggests that patients can meaningfully feed back to healthcare providers about the safety of their care. The PRASE (Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment) intervention provides a way to systematically collect feedback from patients to support service improvement. The intervention is being implemented in acute care settings with patient feedback collected by hospital volunteers for the first time.

objectiveTo undertake a formative evaluation which explores the feasibility and acceptability of the PRASE intervention delivered in collaboration with hospital volunteers from the perspectives of key stakeholders.

designA qualitative evaluation design was adopted across two acute NHS trusts in the UK between July 2014 and November 2015. We conducted five focus groups with hospital volunteers (n=15), voluntary services and patient experience staff (n=3) and semi-structured interviews with ward staff (n=5). Data were interpreted using framework analysis.

resultsAll stakeholders were positive about the PRASE intervention as a way to support service improvement, and the benefits of involving volunteers. Volunteers felt adequate training and support would be essential for retention. Staff concentrated on the infrastructure needed for implementation and raised concerns around sustainability. Findings were fed back to the implementation team to support revisions to the intervention moving into the subsequent summative evaluation phase.

conclusionAlthough there are concerns regarding sustainability in practice, the PRASE intervention delivered in collaboration with hospital volunteers is a promising approach to collect patient feedback for service improvement.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SafetyCooperative BehaviorEnvironmentHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospital VolunteersHumansInterviews as TopicPatient SatisfactionPersonnel, HospitalQualitative ResearchSafety ManagementState Medicineevaluationimprovement sciencepatient feedbackpatient involvementpatient safetyvolunteers

Identifiers

PMID28618095
PMCPMC5600221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.