ArticleAmerican journal of physical anthropology2017
The sex-selective impact of the Black Death and recurring plagues in the Southern Netherlands, 1349-1450.
Article in American journal of physical anthropology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- CD4Nature communications · 2026Article
- Selective mortality during famine and plague events in medieval London.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Effect of Sex on Mortality Risks in Medieval Ireland.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025Article
- Differential pathogenicity and lethality of bubonic plague (1720-1945) by sex, age and place.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Human Archaeological Dentin as Source of Polar and Less Polar Metabolites for Untargeted Metabolomic Research: The Case ofMetabolites · 2023Article
- Article
- Dancing with death. A historical perspective on coping with Covid-19.Risk, hazards & crisis in public policy · 2021Article
- A digital reconstruction of the 1630-1631 large plague outbreak in Venice.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Mortality and demographic recovery in early post-black death epidemics: Role of recent emigrants in medieval Dijon.PloS one · 2020Article
- The 'light touch' of the Black Death in the Southern Netherlands: an urban trick?The Economic history review · 2019Article
- Epidemiology of a bubonic plague outbreak in Glasgow, Scotland in 1900.Royal Society open science · 2019Article
- Integrative approach usingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- A critical review of anthropological studies on skeletons from European plague pits of different epochs.Scientific reports · 2018Review
- The sex-selective impact of the Black Death and recurring plagues in the Southern Netherlands, 1349-1450.American journal of physical anthropology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although recent work has begun to establish that early modern plagues had selective mortality effects, it was generally accepted that the initial outbreak of Black Death in 1347-52 was a "universal killer." Recent bioarchaeological work, however, has argued that the Black Death was also selective with regard to age and pre-plague health status. The issue of the Black Death's potential sex selectivity is less clear. Bioarchaeological research hypothesizes that sex-selection in mortality was possible during the initial Black Death outbreak, and we present evidence from historical sources to test this notion.
objectiveTo determine whether the Black Death and recurring plagues in the period 1349-1450 had a sex-selective mortality effect. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe present a newly compiled database of mortality information taken from mortmain records in Hainaut, Belgium, in the period 1349-1450, which not only is an important new source of information on medieval mortality, but also allows for sex-disaggregation.
resultsWe find that the Black Death period of 1349-51, as well as recurring plagues in the 100 years up to 1450, often had a sex-selective effect-killing more women than in "non-plague years." DISCUSSION: Although much research tends to suggest that men are more susceptible to a variety of diseases caused by bacteria, viruses and parasites, we cannot assume that the same direction of sex-selection in mortality applied to diseases in the distant past such as Second Pandemic plagues. While the exact reasons for the sex-selective effect of late-medieval plague are unclear in the absence of further data, we suggest that simple inequities between the sexes in exposure to the disease may not have been a key driver.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.