ArticleJournal of anatomy2017
What is the variability in shoulder, axillae and waist position in a group of adolescents?
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is Shoulder Imbalance a Useful Parameter in the Screening of Idiopathic Scoliosis? A Preliminary Study.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2023Article
- The relationship between minor coronal asymmetry of the spine and measures of spinal sagittal shape in adolescents without visible scoliosis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Evaluation of changes in shoulder balance and prediction of final shoulder imbalance during growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- The effects of scoliosis and subsequent surgery on the shape of the torso.Scoliosis and spinal disorders · 2017Article
- Do the SRS-22 self-image and mental health domain scores reflect the degree of asymmetry of the back in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?Scoliosis and spinal disorders · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical assessment of scoliosis is based on the recognition of asymmetry. It is not clear what the degree of asymmetry is in a population without scoliosis, which could make the differentiation between abnormal and normal uncertain. This study defines the range of normality in certain parameters of torso shape that are also associated with the clinical assessment of scoliosis. This was done by analysing the surface topography of a group of 195 children serially measured over a 5-year period. The analysis considered both the spinal curvature and the relative position of shoulders, axillae and waist on each side. The bivariate relationships were examined using 95% confidence interval data ellipses. Our results showed that a degree of spinal curvature was seen, either as a main thoracic or main thoracolumbar curve. The distribution of the data about a mean point is illustrated by 95% confidence interval (CI) data ellipses with shoulder, axilla and waist data plotted against spinal curvature. The mean values were close to zero (exact symmetry) for all of the measured parameters, with the ellipses showing little differences in the distributions. We conclude that mild asymmetry of the measured torso parameters is normal. These results define what is normal and beyond what point asymmetry becomes abnormal. This information is of use for those managing and counselling patients with scoliosis both before and after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.