Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28617854›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Choroidal thickness in school children: The Gobi Desert Children Eye Study.

Dan Zhu, Yan Wang, Yan Fei Zheng, Da Yong Yang, Kai Guo, Xian Rong Yang, Xin Xia Jing, Ian Y Wong, Qi Sheng You, Yong Tao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dan ZhuThe Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Yan WangThe Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Yan Fei ZhengThe Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Da Yong YangThe Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Kai GuoThe Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Xian Rong YangThe Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Xin Xia JingThe Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Ian Y WongDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Qi Sheng YouBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yong TaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jost B JonasBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2972-5227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate choroidal thickness (CT) and its associations in children in a school-based study.

methodsThe cross-sectional school-based Gobi Desert Children Eye Study included 1565 out of 1911 (81.9%) eligible children from all schools in the oasis region of Ejina in the Gobi Desert. A detailed ophthalmic examination was performed, including spectral-domain optical coherence tomography with enhanced depth imaging for CT measurement.

resultsCT measurements were available for 1463 (93.5%) students (mean age: 11.8±3.5 years; range:7-21 years). Mean subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) was 282±49μm. CT was thickest at 1000μm temporal to the fovea (286±49μm), followed by the subfoveal region (282±49 μm; P<0.001), the region at 2500μm temporal to the fovea (278±49μm), the region at 1000μm nasal to the fovea (254±49μm;P<0.001), and the region at 2500μm nasal to the fovea (197±50μm;P<0.001). In cross-sectional analysis, the mean SFCT increased with age from 288μm at 7 years of age to 304μm at 11 years, and then decreased to 258 μm at 18 years. In multivariate analysis, thicker SFCT was associated (regression coefficient r:0.38) with higher hyperopic refractive error (P<0.001;standardized regression coefficient beta:0.31;non-standardized regression coefficient B:7.61;95% confidence intervals (CI):6.29,8.93), younger age (P<0.001;beta:-0.10;B:-1.39;95%CI:-2.14,-0.64), male gender (P = 0.03;beta:-0.05;B:-5.33;95%CI:-10.1,-0.53), higher corneal refractive power (P<0.001;beta:0.12;B:3.68;95%CI:2.12,5.24), and non-Han Chinese ethnicity (P = 0.03;beta:0.05;B:6.16;95%CI:0.50,11.8). Ratio of CT(1000μm nasal to fovea)/SFCT (0.90±0.06;range:0.66,1.23) and ratio of CT(2500μm nasal to fovea)/SFCT (0.70±0.13;range:0.28,1.23) decreased with older age (P = 0.01;and P = 0.001, respectively), while ratio of CT(1000μm temporal to fovea)/SFCT (1.02±0.06;range:0.56,1.37) and ratio of CT(2500μm temporal to fovea)/SFCT (0.99±0.11;range:0.54,1.84) increased with older age (both P<0.001). Time spent outdoors or indoors was not significantly associated with CT-related parameter in multivariate analysis.

conclusionsIn contrast to SFCT in adults and despite elongating axial length, SFCT in children increased in cross-sectional analysis with older age (up to 11 years of age) and then started to decrease with further ageing. It suggests an increase in choroidal volume up to the age of 11 years. In children, the choroid was thickest at 1000μm temporal to the fovea, followed by the subfoveal region, and this difference significantly increased with older age. In contrast, CT nasal to the fovea in relationship to SFCT decreased with older age. CT was independent of lifestyle-associated parameters.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultAgingChildChinaChoroidCross-Sectional StudiesDesert ClimateFemaleHumansMaleTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID28617854
PMCPMC5472304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.