Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28617835›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Autopsy rates in the Netherlands: 35 years of decline.

Britt M Blokker, Annick C Weustink, M G Myriam Hunink, J Wolter Oosterhuis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Minimally invasive autopsy - endoscopic approach to post-mortem diagnostics.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Cause of death and the autopsy rate in an elderly population.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Inter-center variation in autopsy practices among regional neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Britt M BlokkerDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9150-7680
Annick C WeustinkDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
M G Myriam HuninkDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
J Wolter OosterhuisDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough the autopsy still is a valuable tool in health statistics, health care quality control, medical education, and biomedical research, autopsy rates have been declining worldwide. The aim of this study was to examine trends of overall, clinical and forensic autopsy rates among adults in the Netherlands over the last four decades, and trends per sex, age (groups), and hospital type.

methodsWe performed a retrospective study covering 35 years of Dutch national death counts (1977-2011), the number of in-hospital deceased patients, the number of deaths due to external causes, and the proportion of autopsies performed in these populations. The effects of sex, age and hospital category were analysed by linear and logistic regression and differences were evaluated by chi-square tests.

resultsOverall autopsy rates declined by 0.3% per calendar year, clinical autopsy rates by 0.7% per calendar year (from 31.4% to 7.7%), and forensic autopsy rates did not decline. Per calendar year the fraction of in-hospital deceased patients decreased by 0.2%. Autopsy rates were highest among men and younger patients; clinical autopsy rates were highest for patients dying in academic hospitals.

conclusionsIn the Netherlands clinical autopsy rates have rapidly declined while at the same time the fraction of in-hospital deaths decreased, both contributing to the overall reduced absolute number of autopsies performed. It is important to improve awareness among both clinicians and general practitioners of the significance of the clinical autopsy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutopsyCause of DeathChildChild, PreschoolFemaleForensic MedicineHospital MortalityHumansInfantLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID28617835
PMCPMC5472266
OpenAlexW2627080943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.