Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28617804›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Integrating Tenascin-C protein expression and 1q25 copy number status in pediatric intracranial ependymoma prognostication: A new model for risk stratification.

Felipe Andreiuolo, Gwénaël Le Teuff, Mohamed Amine Bayar, John-Paul Kilday, Torsten Pietsch, André O von Bueren, Hendrik Witt, Andrey Korshunov, Piergiorgio Modena, Stefan M Pfister and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Prognostic Role of Tenascin-C for Cancer Outcome: A Meta-Analysis.Technology in cancer research & treatment · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 16 institutions in 5 countries.

Felipe AndreiuoloUniversité Paris-Sud, Gustave Roussy, CNRS UMR 8203 "Vectorologie et Thérapeutiques Anticancéreuses", Villejuif, France.
Gwénaël Le TeuffDepartement de Biostatistique et Epidemiologie, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris, Villejuif, France.
Mohamed Amine BayarDepartement de Biostatistique et Epidemiologie, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris, Villejuif, France.
John-Paul KildayChildren's Brain Tumour Research Network (CBTRN), Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Torsten PietschInstitute of Neuropathology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.
André O von BuerenDepartment of Paediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Hendrik WittDivision of Paediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Department of Paediatric Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andrey KorshunovClinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Piergiorgio ModenaGenetics Unit, Pathology Department, Ospedale S. Anna, Como, Italy.
Stefan M PfisterDivision of Paediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Department of Paediatric Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mélanie PagèsDépartement de Neuropathologie, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.
David CastelUniversité Paris-Sud, Gustave Roussy, CNRS UMR 8203 "Vectorologie et Thérapeutiques Anticancéreuses", Villejuif, France.
Felice GiangasperoDepartment of Radiology, Oncology and Anatomo-Pathology, Sapienza University, Roma, Italy.
Leila ChimelliDepartamento de Patologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Pascale VarletDépartement de Neuropathologie, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.
Stefan RutkowskiDepartment of Paediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Didier FrappazInstitut d'Hématologie-Oncologie Pédiatrique, Lyon, France.
Maura MassiminoPaediatric Unit, Fondazione Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Richard GrundyThe Children's Brain Tumour Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Jacques GrillUniversité Paris-Sud, Gustave Roussy, CNRS UMR 8203 "Vectorologie et Thérapeutiques Anticancéreuses", Villejuif, France.
SIOP Ependymoma Biology Working Group BIOMECA (BIOlogical Markers for Ependymomas in Children and Adolescents)
Heidelberg University · DELaboratoire de Vectorologie et Thérapeutiques Anticancéreuses · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FRUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DECentre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne · FRFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITGerman Cancer Research Center · DEInserm · FRInstitut d’Hématologie et d’Oncologie Pédiatrique · FRIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITOspedale Sant'Anna · ITUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite multimodal therapy, prognosis of pediatric intracranial ependymomas remains poor with a 5-year survival rate below 70% and frequent late deaths. EXPERIMENTAL

designThis multicentric European study evaluated putative prognostic biomarkers. Tenascin-C (TNC) immunohistochemical expression and copy number status of 1q25 were retained for a pooled analysis of 5 independent cohorts. The prognostic value of TNC and 1q25 on the overall survival (OS) was assessed using a Cox model adjusted to age at diagnosis, tumor location, WHO grade, extent of resection, radiotherapy and stratified by cohort. Stratification on a predictor that did not satisfy the proportional hazards assumption was considered. Model performance was evaluated and an internal-external cross validation was performed.

resultsAmong complete cases with 5-year median follow-up (n = 470; 131 deaths), TNC and 1q25 gain were significantly associated with age at diagnosis and posterior fossa tumor location. 1q25 status added independent prognostic value for death beyond the classical variables with a hazard ratio (HR) = 2.19 95%CI = [1.29; 3.76] (p = 0.004), while TNC prognostic relation was tumor location-dependent with HR = 2.19 95%CI = [1.29; 3.76] (p = 0.004) in posterior fossa and HR = 0.64 [0.28; 1.48] (p = 0.295) in supratentorial (interaction p value = 0.015). The derived prognostic score identified 3 different robust risk groups. The omission of upfront RT was not associated with OS for good and intermediate prognostic groups while the absence of upfront RT was negatively associated with OS in the poor risk group.

conclusionIntegrated TNC expression and 1q25 status are useful to better stratify patients and to eventually adapt treatment regimens in pediatric intracranial ependymoma.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsAge of OnsetChildChild, PreschoolChromosomes, Human, Pair 1EpendymomaFemaleHumansInfantMalePrognosisSurvival AnalysisTenascinTenascin

Identifiers

PMID28617804
PMCPMC5472261
OpenAlexW2625898728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.