Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28617751›Full record

ReviewAdvances in skin & wound care2017

Economic Evaluations of Strategies to Prevent Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries.

Wrechelle Ocampo, Amanda Cheung, Barry Baylis, Nancy Clayden, John M Conly, William A Ghali, Chester H Ho, Jaime Kaufman, Henry T Stelfox, David B Hogan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in skin & wound care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wrechelle OcampoWrechelle Ocampo, MBT • Research Associate • W21C Research and Innovation Centre, Cumming School of Medicine • University of Calgary • Calgary, Alberta • Canada Amanda Cheung, MBT, BS • Research Assistant • W21C Research and Innovation Centre, Cumming School of Medicine • University of Calgary • Calgary, Alberta • Canada Barry Baylis, MD • Executive Codirector • W21C Research and Innovation Centre, Cumming School of Medicine • University of Calgary • Calgary, Alberta • Canada • Clinical Associate Professor • Department of Medicine • University of Calgary Nancy Clayden, EMT-P • Research Associate • W21C Research and Innovation Centre, Cumming School of Medicine • University of Calgary • Calgary, Alberta • Canada John M. Conly, MD • Medical Director • W21C Research and Innovation Centre, Cumming School of Medicine • University of Calgary • Calgary, Alberta • Canada • Professor • Departments of Medicine, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases • University of Calgary William A. Ghali, MD • Scientific Director • O'Brien Institute for Public Health • University of Calgary • Calgary, Alberta • Canada • Professor • Division of General Internal Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences • Cumming School of Medicine • University of Calgary Chester H. Ho, MD • Associate Professor and Head • Department of Clinical Neurosciences • University of Calgary • Calgary, Alberta • Canada Jaime Kaufman, PhD • Manager • W21C Strategic Programs • W21C Research and Innovation Centre • Cumming School of Medicine • University of Calgary • Calgary, Alberta • Canada Henry T. Stelfox, MD, PhD • Associate Professor • Departments of Community Health Sciences, Medicine, and Critical Care Medicine • University of Calgary • Calgary, Alberta • Canada David B. Hogan, MD • Brenda Stafford Foundation Chair • Geriatric Medicine • Calgary, Alberta • Canada • Professor • Departments of Medicine, Clinical Neurosciences, and Community Health Sciences • Cumming School of Medicine • University of Calgary • Calgary, Alberta • Canada.
Amanda Cheung
Barry Baylis
Nancy Clayden
John M Conly
William A Ghali
Chester H Ho
Jaime Kaufman
Henry T Stelfox
David B Hogan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

general purposeTo provide information from a review of literature about economic evaluations of preventive strategies for pressure injuries (PIs). TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant should be better able to:1. Identify the purpose and methods used for this study.2. Compare costs and effectiveness related to preventative strategies for PIs. ABSTRACT:

backgroundPressure injuries (PIs) are a common and resource-intensive challenge for acute care hospitals worldwide. While a number of preventive strategies have the potential to reduce the cost of hospital-acquired PIs, it is unclear what approach is the most effective.

objectiveThe authors performed a narrative review of the literature on economic evaluations of preventive strategies to survey current findings and identify important factors in economic assessments. DATA SOURCES: Ovid, MEDLINE, NHS Economic Evaluation Databases, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsSELECTION CRITERIA: Potentially relevant original research articles and systematic reviews were considered. DATA EXTRACTION: Selection criteria included articles that were written in English, provided data on cost or economic evaluations of preventive strategies of PIs in acute care, and published between January 2004 and September 2015. Data were abstracted from the articles using a standardized approach to evaluate how the items on the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist were addressed. DATA SYNTHESIS: The searches identified 192 references. Thirty-three original articles were chosen for full-text reviews. Nineteen of these articles provided clear descriptions of interventions, study methods, and outcomes considered.

conclusionsLimitations in the available literature prevent firm conclusions from being reached about the relative economic merits of the various approaches to the prevention of PIs. The authors' review revealed a need for additional high-quality studies that adhere to commonly used standards of both currently utilized and emerging ways to prevent hospital-acquired PIs.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresCost SavingsHospitalizationHumansIatrogenic DiseasePressure UlcerQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID28617751
PMCPMC5482558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.