Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28617730›Full record

ArticleEye & contact lens2018

Eye Symptom Questionnaire to Evaluate Anterior Eye Health.

Maria A Woodward, Nita G Valikodath, Paula Anne Newman-Casey, Leslie M Niziol, David C Musch, Paul P Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye & contact lens, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Could telehealth help eye care practitioners adapt contact lens services during the COVID-19 pandemic?Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria A WoodwardDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (M.A.W., N.G.V., P.A.N.-C., L.M.N., D.C.M., P.P.L.), University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation (M.A.W., P.A.N.-C., D.C.M., P.P.L.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Department of Epidemiology (D.C.M.), University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI.
Nita G Valikodath
Paula Anne Newman-Casey
Leslie M Niziol
David C Musch
Paul P Lee

Funding

Telemedicine For Anterior Eye DiseasesK23EY023596 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WOODWARD, MARIA ANNEKE · 2013 to 2017
$1.1M
Improving glaucoma self-management with technology-supported counselorsK23EY025320 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NEWMAN-CASEY, PAULA ANNE · 2016 to 2019
$920k
Assessing the impact of glaucoma and its treatment on the personR21EY025719 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MUSCH, DAVID C · 2015 to 2016
$426k
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY023596NEI NIH HHS K23 EY025320NEI NIH HHS R21 EY025719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOphthalmologists assess eye complaints with a careful history and eye examination; however, other types of physicians have limited tools to evaluate anterior segment (AS) eye diseases. We identified the eye symptom questions that providers should ask to help determine the presence and urgency of AS eye diseases.

methodsPersons with and without AS disease completed a self-report eye symptom questionnaire (ESQ) based on the National Institutes of Health Toolbox symptom items in an academic center's corneal and comprehensive eye clinics. Gold standard ophthalmic examination determined the presence and urgency of AS disease. The association between reported symptom severity and the probability of AS disease, or urgent AS disease, was evaluated using logistic regression models, and sensitivity and specificity of the ESQ were also calculated.

resultsA total of 324 eyes of 162 subjects were included in the study. Of these, AS disease was present in 255 eyes (79%); of which, 111 eyes showed urgent disease. Increasing symptom severity for eye pain (odds ratio [OR]=2.58; P<0.001), glare (OR=2.61; P=0.001), and blurry vision (OR=1.98; P<0.001) were associated with increased odds of AS disease. Increasing symptom severity for eye pain (OR=2.02; P<0.001), eye redness (OR=1.69; P=0.02), and blurry vision (OR=1.41, P=0.01) were associated with increased odds of urgent AS disease. For the primary analysis with mild symptoms considered relevant, the sensitivity of the ESQ to detect AS disease was 83% and to detect urgent AS disease was 92%.

conclusionSymptoms of eye pain, glare, redness, and blurry vision indicate the presence and urgency of AS disease.

Indexed as

Anterior Eye SegmentAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalEye DiseasesEye PainFemaleGlareHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28617730
PMCPMC5730507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.