Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28617450›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2017

A human intestinal M-cell-like model for investigating particle, antigen and microorganism translocation.

Ana Beloqui, David J Brayden, Per Artursson, Véronique Préat, Anne des Rieux

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Recent Advances in Cell-Based In Vitro Models to Recreate Human Intestinal Inflammation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Functional assays to evaluate antibody-mediated responses againstFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. An update on oral drug deliveryActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ana BeloquiDepartment of Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4221-3357
David J BraydenVeterinary Biosciences Section, School of Veterinary Medicine and Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8781-8344
Per ArturssonDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3708-7395
Véronique PréatDepartment of Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Anne des RieuxDepartment of Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
UCLouvain · BEUniversity College Dublin · IEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The specialized microfold cells (M cells) in the follicle-associated epithelium (FAE) of intestinal Peyer's patches serve as antigen-sampling cells of the intestinal innate immune system. Unlike 'classical' enterocytes, they are able to translocate diverse particulates without digesting them. They act as pathways for microorganism invasion and mediate food tolerance by transcellular transport of intestinal microbiota and antigens. Their ability to transcytose intact particles can be used to develop oral drug delivery and oral immunization strategies. This protocol describes a reproducible and versatile human M-cell-like in vitro model. This model can be exploited to evaluate M-cell transport of microparticles and nanoparticles for protein, drug or vaccine delivery and to study bacterial adherence and translocation across M cells. The inverted in vitro M-cell model consists of three main steps. First, Caco-2 cells are seeded at the apical side of the inserts. Second, the inserts are inverted and B lymphocytes are seeded at the basolateral side of the inserts. Third, the conversion to M cells is assessed. Although various M-cell culture systems exist, this model provides several advantages over the rest: (i) it is based on coculture with well-established differentiated human cell lines; (ii) it is reproducible under the conditions described herein; (iii) it can be easily mastered; and (iv) it does not require the isolation of primary cells or the use of animals. The protocol requires skills in cell culture and microscopy analysis. The model is obtained after 3 weeks, and transport experiments across the differentiated model can be carried out over periods of up to 10 h.

Indexed as

TranscytosisAntigensCytological TechniquesEpithelial CellsHumansParticulate MatterPeyer's PatchesAntigensParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID28617450
OpenAlexW2625919534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.