Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28617424›Full record

Observational studyJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2017

Outcomes following indomethacin prophylaxis in extremely preterm infants in an all-referral NICU.

T D Nelin, E Pena, T Giacomazzi, S Lee, J W Logan, M Moallem, R Bapat, E G Shepherd, L D Nelin

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Effects of prophylactic indomethacin on intraventricular hemorrhage and adverse outcomes in neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Development of a small baby unit to improve outcomes for the extremely premature infant.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Letter to the editor.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T D NelinCenter for Perinatal Research, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
E PenaSmall Baby ICU, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
T GiacomazziSmall Baby ICU, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
S LeeSmall Baby ICU, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
J W LoganSmall Baby ICU, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
M MoallemSmall Baby ICU, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
R BapatSmall Baby ICU, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
E G ShepherdSmall Baby ICU, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
L D NelinCenter for Perinatal Research, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Nationwide Children's Hospital · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe examined data from a contemporary cohort of extreme prematurity (EP) infants admitted to an all-referral Children's Hospital neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to determine whether prophylactic indomethacin (PI) may continue to benefit these patients. STUDY

designAn observational study utilizing the small baby ICU data registry that was queried for all EP infants admitted between 2005 and 2014 with documentation of PI use (671 total EP infants; 141 (21%) did not receive PI (control); 530 (79%) received PI (PI). This cohort of EP infants was born at outside hospitals and transferred to our level IV NICU with a mean age on admission of 13 days, well after the PI would have been administered.

resultsNo difference existed between the control and PI groups in gestational age, birth weight, severity of illness, other in-hospital outcomes or developmental delay. PI infants had a significantly lower mortality rate (P=0.0004), lower relative risk (RR) for mortality 0.52 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37 to 0.73, P=0.0001) and lower RR of developing the combined outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98, P=0.012) when compared with the control group. Notably, there was no significant effect of PI on incidence of severe intraventricular hemorrhage or patent ductus arteriosus ligation.

conclusionPI administration was associated with improved survival in EP infants referred to a level IV Children's Hospital NICU.

Indexed as

Bronchopulmonary DysplasiaCerebral Intraventricular HemorrhageChemopreventionDuctus Arteriosus, PatentAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBirth WeightFemaleGestational AgeHumansIndomethacinInfantInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalIndomethacin

Identifiers

PMID28617424
OpenAlexW2626954617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.