ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2017
Analysis of "Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation of a New, Wireless-Enabled Blood Glucose Monitoring System That Links to a Smart Mobile Device".
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of "Capillary and Venous Blood Glucose Accuracy in Blood Glucose Meters Versus Reference Standards: The Impact of Study Design on Accuracy Evaluations".Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the study published in Journal of Diabetes, Science and Technology, Timothy S. Bailey and coauthors evaluated system accuracy and user performance of a new, wireless-enabled blood glucose monitoring system, the Contour Plus ONE blood glucose monitoring system. The authors declare that the study protocol was performed according to ISO 15197:2013 guidelines, in particular to clauses 6.3 and 8. Results show a high level of accuracy of the product in a laboratory setting as well as in the hands of lay users. However, differences between both study parts emerge that stimulate discussion about the used comparison method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.