Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28616862›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2018

Loops D, E and G in the Drosophila Dα1 subunit contribute to high neonicotinoid sensitivity of Dα1-chicken β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.

Makoto Ihara, Mai Hikida, Hiroyuki Matsushita, Kyosuke Yamanaka, Yuya Kishimoto, Kazuki Kubo, Shun Watanabe, Mifumi Sakamoto, Koutaro Matsui, Akihiro Yamaguchi and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. (-)-Adaline from theMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Slo2/KThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.British journal of pharmacology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Makoto IharaDepartment of Applied Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6403-0781
Mai HikidaDepartment of Applied Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, Nara, Japan.
Hiroyuki MatsushitaDepartment of Applied Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, Nara, Japan.
Kyosuke YamanakaDepartment of Applied Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, Nara, Japan.
Yuya KishimotoDepartment of Applied Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, Nara, Japan.
Kazuki KuboDepartment of Applied Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, Nara, Japan.
Shun WatanabeDepartment of Applied Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, Nara, Japan.
Mifumi SakamotoDepartment of Applied Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, Nara, Japan.
Koutaro MatsuiDepartment of Applied Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, Nara, Japan.
Akihiro YamaguchiDepartment of Applied Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, Nara, Japan.
Daiki OkuharaDepartment of Applied Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, Nara, Japan.
Shogo FurutaniDepartment of Applied Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, Nara, Japan.
David B SattelleCentre for Respiratory Biology, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0705-5242
Kazuhiko MatsudaDepartment of Applied Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1299-4570
Kindai University · JPUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeNeonicotinoid insecticides interact with the orthosteric site formed at subunit interfaces of insect nicotinic ACh (nACh) receptors. However, their interactions with the orthosteric sites at α-non α and α-α subunit interfaces remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to elucidate the mechanism of neonicotinoid actions using the Drosophila Dα1-chicken β2 hybrid nACh receptor. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Computer models of the (Dα1) KEY

resultsThe (Dα1) CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These findings suggest that a triangle of residues from loops D, E and G contribute to the selective actions of neonicotinoids on insect-vertebrate hybrid nACh receptors. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v175.11/issuetoc.

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensDrosophila ProteinsFemaleHumansModels, MolecularNeonicotinoidsNicotinic AgonistsOocytesPatch-Clamp TechniquesReceptors, NicotinicXenopus laevisDrosophila ProteinsNeonicotinoidsNicotinic AgonistsReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID28616862
PMCPMC5979822
OpenAlexW2749607210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.