Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28616797›Full record

Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2018

The efficacy and safety of bimatoprost/timolol maleate, latanoprost/timolol maleate, and travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combinations on 24-h IOP.

Suzan Guven Yilmaz, Cumali Degirmenci, Yunus Emre Karakoyun, Emil Yusifov, Halil Ates

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04891588 (Evaluation of Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Patients With Pre-existing Ocular Surface Disease Switched From a Preserved Prostaglandin Analog - Timolol Fixed Combination to a Preservative - Free Latanoprost - Timolol Fixed Combination), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04891588 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Patients With Pre-existing Ocular Surface Disease Switched From a Preserved Prostaglandin Analog - Timolol Fixed Combination to a Preservative - Free Latanoprost - Timolol Fixed Combination

TypeinterventionalSponsorKlinički Bolnički Centar ZagrebRan2021 to 2021Enrolled50ConditionsPrimary Open-angle Glaucoma, Ocular HypertensionArmsSwitching the preserved prostaglandin analog-timolol FC to Fixalpost (preservative free prostaglandin analog-timolol FC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. From Eye Care to Hair Growth: Bimatoprost.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suzan Guven YilmazDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey. suziguven@yahoo.com.
Cumali DegirmenciDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Yunus Emre KarakoyunDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Emil YusifovDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Halil AtesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Ege University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effect of bimatoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination (BTFC), latanoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination (LTFC), and travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination (TTFC) on 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

methodsThis prospective, observer-masked, randomized study included 50 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. All patients were using hypotensive lipids and timolol maleate fixed combination treatment for ≥4 weeks and had an IOP ≤ 21 mmHg. Group 1 (n = 18) received BTFC, group 2 (n = 14) received LTFC, and group 3 (n = 18) received TTFC. All patients were hospitalized, and IOP was monitored for 24-h (10:00, 14:00, 18:00, 22:00, 02:00, and 06:00). Mean diurnal IOP variation measurements were taken between 06:00 and 18:00, and mean nocturnal IOP variation measurements were taken between 22:00 and 02:00. Mean IOP and IOP variation in the three groups were compared.

resultsMean 24-h IOP did not differ significantly between the three groups (group 1: 14.6 ± 2.9 mmHg; group 2: 14.1 ± 3.7 mmHg and group 3: 15.8 ± 2.0 mmHg; P > 0.05). Mean diurnal IOP variation was 4.6 ± 2.3 mmHg in group 1, 5.8 ± 2.4 mmHg in group 2, and 4.3 ± 1.7 mmHg in group 3, and mean nocturnal IOP variation was 3.2 ± 2.8 mmHg in group 1, 2.9 ± 1.9 mmHg in group 2, and 3.0 ± 1.6 mmHg group 3. There were not any significant differences in diurnal or nocturnal IOP variation between the three groups (P < 0.05).

conclusionAll three fixed combinations effectively controlled IOP for 24-h and had a similar effect on diurnal and nocturnal IOP variations.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmAgedAged, 80 and overBimatoprostDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug SubstitutionDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlaucoma, Open-AngleGonioscopyHumansIntraocular PressureLatanoprostMaleMiddle AgedBimatoprostLatanoprostProstaglandins F, SyntheticTimololTravoprost24-h IOPAnd travoprost/timolol maleateBimatoprost/timolol maleateLatanoprost/timolol maleate

Identifiers

PMID28616797
OpenAlexW2734527599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.