ReviewIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2017
Borders, Tensegrity and Development in Dialogue.
Review in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking real-time learning in debriefing: liminality, microgenesis, and semiotic borders.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2026Article
- Doping Existential Despair: Mindful of the Exotic Lure.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2024Article
- Development through Borders: Photogrammetry of a Moving Experience.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2024Article
- Viktor von Weizsäcker's Notion of Pathic: Affective Liminality, Modalization of Experience and Illness.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2024Article
- The Movement Between Agreement and Disagreement in Self Positions Through a Musico-Logical Metaphor.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2023Article
- Transitions of bonding: The borders between hidden roots and visible roads in life course.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2022Article
- Self-Construction in Immigration - I-Positioning through Tensional Dialogues to Powerful Foreign and Native Voices.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2021Article
- Ambiguity and Ambivalence: an Issue for the Subjective Dynamics in the Relation between Language and Affection.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2021Article
- Dialogues in Infertility: Exploring the Potential for Psychological Adaptation.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2020Article
- "Systematic Semiotic Organisation and Anthropologisation of the Science of Soul - Towards Cultural Psychology".Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2020Article
- "I Feel More Luxembourgish, but Portuguese Too" Cultural Identities in a Multicultural Society.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2020Article
- "Well Now we Have Entered University and So On, but". Autodialogue and Circumvention Strategies in Reflections about Being a University Student.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2019Article
- The Semiotic Construction of the Sense of Agency. The Modal Articulation in Narrative Processes.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article we propose a development of the Dialogical Self Theory by introducing the notions of borders, cogenetic logic and tensegrity that we have elaborated during the last 5 years, in order to introduce a stronger developmental and dynamic perspective within the theory. We start from the discussion of some recent advancements of the model proposed by Hermans et al. (Integrative Psychological and Behavioural Science, 51(4), 2017), who refer to the metaphor of democratic society of the Self to understand the challenges and possible directions of adaptation that the persons can face in those border-crossing processes characterizing contemporary western societies. We conceptualized the Self as a dynamic semiotic system in constant evolutive tension, rather than a system in equilibrium adapting to the environmental changing conditions. Then, we propose to replace the concept of stability and continuity of the Self with the more fruitful idea of tensional integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28616697What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.