ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2016
Thrombolytics in VAD management - A single-center experience.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accelerated LVAD pump thrombosis in COVID-19 patient: Case report and mini review.Journal of cardiac surgery · 2022Review
- Sudden severe left ventricular assist device inflow cannula obstruction caused by huge thrombus after closure of mechanical aortic valve: case report.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2022Article
- Evolution of thrombolytic therapy in patients with HeartWare ventricular assist device thrombosis: a single-institutional experience.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Left Ventricular Assist Device Thrombosis: Combined Approach by Echocardiography and Logfiles Review for Diagnosis and Management.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2022Article
- Approaches to ventricular assist device exchange: Resternotomy versus limited incisions.JTCVS techniques · 2022Article
- Identification of characteristics, risk factors, and predictors of recurrent LVAD thrombosis: conditions in HeartWare devices.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2021Article
- Article
- Left Ventricular Assist Devices 101: Shared Care for General Cardiologists and Primary Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy in stage D heart failure.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith continued increase in the use of mechanical circulatory support, the incidence of device thrombus remains a challenge. This study is a retrospective analysis of data at a single center to assess the safety and efficacy of thrombolytic use in durable mechanical assist devices.
methodsData was analyzed retrospectively from 154 patients who underwent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation from 1/1/2005 to 6/30/2014. The HMII device was implanted in 131 patients while 23 received the HVAD. LVAD thrombus was diagnosed when lactate dehydrogenase levels exceeded 1000 units/l accompanied by clinical signs of hemolysis and heart failure, echocardiographic data and surges in pump power. TPA (tissue plasminogen activator) protocol consisted of a 5 mg intravenous bolus followed by 3 mg/h infusion in normal saline for 10 h. If symptoms persisted another cycle of TPA at 1 mg/h was continued up to 48 h.
resultsThe TPA group had a 70% success rate. Success was defined as complete resolution of hemolysis and clinical symptoms with no requirement for LVAD exchange at 30 days. 95% survival was noted at 30 days and 90% were free of a hemorrhagic stroke in the TPA group. The rates of hemorrhagic strokes in the TPA group and the control group were not different (OR = 0.92).
conclusionThe TPA protocol described here was successful consistently. Though this study is limited by its size and retrospective nature it leads the way for larger studies to generate more robust comparisons between different types of mechanical assist devices as well as the tailored use of thrombolytics in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.