Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28616509›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2016

Predictors and outcome of no-reflow post primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Jawad Mazhar, Mary Mashicharan, Ahmad Farshid

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05360602 (Evaluation of The Effect of Alpha Lipoic Acid Administration on Oxidative Stress Markers and Occurrence of No-Reflow Phenomenon in Post Myocardial Infarction Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05360602 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of The Effect of Alpha Lipoic Acid Administration on Oxidative Stress Markers and Occurrence of No-Reflow Phenomenon in Post Myocardial Infarction Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled70ConditionsNo-Reflow PhenomenonArmsAlpha Lipoic Acid plus the standard care for post-PCI MI, The standard care for post-PCI MI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Angiographic predictors of outcome in myocardial infarction patients presenting with cardiogenic shock: a CULPRIT-SHOCK angiographic substudy.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. New CHABMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. No-reflow phenomenon in acute myocardial infarction: RelieveInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Liraglutide Increases VEGF ExpressionFrontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jawad MazharThe Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Yamba drive, Garran, ACT 2605, Australia.
Mary MashicharanThe Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Yamba drive, Garran, ACT 2605, Australia.
Ahmad FarshidThe Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Yamba drive, Garran, ACT 2605, Australia.
Canberra Hospital · AUAustralian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo-reflow (TIMI < 3) during primary PCI (PCI) for STEMI occurs in 11-41% of cases, indicates poor myocardial tissue perfusion, and is associated with a poor outcome. We aimed to determine predictors and 12 month outcomes of patients who developed no-reflow.

methodsWe analysed the PCI database of The Canberra Hospital and identified 781 patients who underwent primary PCI during 2008-2012. Follow-up at 12 months was with letter, phone call and review of hospital records.

resultsNo-reflow was observed in 189 patients (25%) at the end of the procedure. Patients with no-reflow were older (64 vs. 61 years, p = 0.03). No-reflow patients were more likely to have initial TIMI flow < 3 (89% vs. 79%, p = 0.001), thrombus score ≥ 4 (83% vs. 69%, p = 0.0001), higher use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (57% vs. 48%, p = 0.03) and longer median symptom to balloon time (223 min vs. 192 min, p = 0.004). No-reflow was an independent predictor of mortality (HR 1.95, CI 1.04-3.59, p = 0.037) during 12 month follow-up. On multivariate analysis, age > 60 years, thrombus score ≥ 4 and symptom to balloon time > 360 min were independent predictors of no-reflow. In 17% of cases of no reflow, it occurred only after stent insertion.

conclusionsNo-reflow occurred in 25% of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI and was more likely with older age, high thrombus burden and delayed presentation. No-reflow was associated with a higher risk of death at 12 month follow-up.

Indexed as

No-reflowPrimary percutaneous coronary interventionSlow coronary flowST elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID28616509
PMCPMC5441318
OpenAlexW2103019998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.