Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28616405›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2017

Endoscopic treatment for distal malignant biliary obstruction.

Kazuya Matsumoto, Yohei Takeda, Takumi Onoyama, Soichiro Kawata, Hiroki Kurumi, Hiroki Koda, Taro Yamashita, Hajime Isomoto

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. TXNIP: A Double-Edged Sword in Disease and Therapeutic Outlook.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kazuya MatsumotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tottori University Hospital, Yonago, Japan.
Yohei TakedaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tottori University Hospital, Yonago, Japan.
Takumi OnoyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tottori University Hospital, Yonago, Japan.
Soichiro KawataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tottori University Hospital, Yonago, Japan.
Hiroki KurumiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tottori University Hospital, Yonago, Japan.
Hiroki KodaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tottori University Hospital, Yonago, Japan.
Taro YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tottori University Hospital, Yonago, Japan.
Hajime IsomotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tottori University Hospital, Yonago, Japan.
Tottori University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) leads to obstructive jaundice as a result of when the bile excretion from the liver is disturbed and induces hepatic failure and sepsis, which when complicated with cholangitis, it becomes necessary to perform drainage for the MBO. For biliary drainage, we can perform a surgical bypass operation, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) via duodenal papilla, or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), which is a transgastrointestinal biliary drainage. Although currently we usually perform EBD for distal MBO to begin with, the choice is different for biliary drainage in patients in whom EBD has failed in a preoperative case or an unresectable case. In other words, we choose PTBD for preoperative cases, and PTBD or EUS-BD according to the ability of the institution for their procedures when EBD has failed. It is desirable not to choose a plastic stent (PS) but a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), in particular for the unresectable cases of pancreatic cancer it is desirable not to choose an uncovered SEMS but a covered SEMS in EBD. Nevertheless, further examinations are expected to decide which, a covered or uncovered SEMS, we should choose in unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC) and whether we should select PS, SEMS or ENBD in preoperative cases.

Indexed as

endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD)EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), plastic stent (PS)Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO)self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS)

Identifiers

PMID28616405
PMCPMC5464936
OpenAlexW2608564870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.